Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 69-239 (2026)

Duties of warehouseman — Contents of records.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Duties of warehouseman — Contents of records.

(1) The warehouseman shall maintain current and complete records at all times with respect to all agricultural commodities handled, deposited, shipped or merchandised by him, including agricultural commodities owned by him. Such records shall include, but are not limited to, a daily position record showing the total quantity of each kind and class of agricultural commodity received and loaded out and the amount remaining on deposit at the close of each business day, and the warehouseman’s total deposit obligation, including agricultural commodities owned by him, for each kind and class of agricultural commodity at the close of each business day.

(2) Every warehouseman purchasing any agricultural commodity from a depositor thereof shall promptly make and keep for five (5) years a correct record showing in detail the following information:

(a) The name and address of the depositor;

(b) The date purchased;

(d) The quality and quantity purchased by the warehouseman and, where applicable, the dockage, tare, grade, size and net weight.

(3) Records required by this section shall be legible and kept in a place of safety in this state. If a person operates at more than one (1) location, records of each location’s transactions must be identifiable.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: Crown v. State, Dep't of Agric., 898 P.2d 1086 (Idaho 1995).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Crown v. State, Dep't of Agric., 898 P.2d 1086 (Idaho 1995). · cites it 2× “7 However, the *180 growers did present the following evidence which suggests that the DOA inspector, Sparrow, acted negligently: (1) his failure to inspect the “settlement sheet” showing actual bean purchases that the Hawkins'Warehouse was required to keep pursuant to I.C. §…”

— Idaho Code § 69-239(2) — 1 case

Crown v. State, Dep't of Agric., 898 P.2d 1086 (Idaho 1995). “7 However, the *180 growers did present the following evidence which suggests that the DOA inspector, Sparrow, acted negligently: (1) his failure to inspect the “settlement sheet” showing actual bean purchases that the Hawkins'Warehouse was required to keep pursuant to I.C. §…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.