Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 7-919 (2026)

Appeals. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Appeals. 

(a) An appeal may be taken from:

(1)  An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under section 7-912, Idaho Code;
(2)  An order granting an application to stay arbitration made under section 7-902(b), Idaho Code;
(3)  An order confirming or denying confirmation of an award;
(4)  An order modifying or correcting an award;
(5)  An order vacating an award without directing a rehearing; or
(6)  A judgment or decree entered pursuant to the provisions of this act.
(b)  The appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1982–2018 · leading case: Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, 141 P.3d 1079 (Idaho 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, 141 P.3d 1079 (Idaho 2006). · cites it 56× “§ 7-919, the legislature, as a substantive matter, clearly created the right to appeal an order denying a motion to compel arbitration.”
Am. & Foreign Ins. Co. v. Reichert, 94 P.3d 699 (Idaho 2004). · cites it 4× “An appeal may be pursued according to I.C. § 7-919(a)(3) when a judge enters an order confirming or denying confirmation of an arbitrator’s award.”
Dan Wiebold Ford, Inc. v. Universal Comput. Consulting Holding, Inc., 127 P.3d 138 (Idaho 2005). · cites it 4× “They contend that appeals under the Idaho Uniform Arbitration Act are governed by Idaho Code § 7-919 [1] and that such statute does not grant the right to appeal from orders compelling arbitration.”
Loomis, Inc. v. Cudahy, 656 P.2d 1359 (Idaho 1982). · cites it 4× “§ 7-913, Modification or corrections of award; I.C. § 7-919, Appeals.) Regardless of judicial supervision it is incumbent upon those in charge of conducting arbitration proceedings to maintain a degree of fairness at least equal to that which is found in a formal court of law.”
Idaho First Bank v. Bridges, 426 P.3d 1278 (Idaho 2018). · cites it 2× “' " I.C. § 7-919(a)(2). Clearwater REI, LLC v.”
East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010). “§ 658A-28; Idaho Code Ann. § 7-919 ; Ind.Code § 34-57- *273 2-19; Iowa Code § 679A.”
Clearwater REI v. Mark Boling, 318 P.3d 944 (Idaho 2014). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 7-919(a)(2). Therefore, the order granting the Counterdefendants’ motion to stay arbitration was appealable as a matter of right.”
Harrison v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 233 P.3d 132 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 7-919(a)(3). Thus, the order confirming the arbitrator’s award was appealable as a matter of right.”
— Idaho Code § 7-919(a) — 1 case
Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, 141 P.3d 1079 (Idaho 2006). “§ 7-919, the legislature, as a substantive matter, clearly created the right to appeal an order denying a motion to compel arbitration.”
— Idaho Code § 7-919(a)(1) — 1 case
Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, 141 P.3d 1079 (Idaho 2006). “§ 7-919, the legislature, as a substantive matter, clearly created the right to appeal an order denying a motion to compel arbitration.”
— Idaho Code § 7-919(a)(2) — 2 cases
Idaho First Bank v. Bridges, 426 P.3d 1278 (Idaho 2018). “' " I.C. § 7-919(a)(2). Clearwater REI, LLC v.”
Clearwater REI v. Mark Boling, 318 P.3d 944 (Idaho 2014). “” I.C. § 7-919(a)(2). Therefore, the order granting the Counterdefendants’ motion to stay arbitration was appealable as a matter of right.”
— Idaho Code § 7-919(a)(3) — 2 cases
Am. & Foreign Ins. Co. v. Reichert, 94 P.3d 699 (Idaho 2004). “An appeal may be pursued according to I.C. § 7-919(a)(3) when a judge enters an order confirming or denying confirmation of an arbitrator’s award.”
Harrison v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 233 P.3d 132 (Idaho 2010). “” I.C. § 7-919(a)(3). Thus, the order confirming the arbitrator’s award was appealable as a matter of right.”
— Idaho Code § 7-919(b) — 1 case
Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, 141 P.3d 1079 (Idaho 2006). “§ 7-919, the legislature, as a substantive matter, clearly created the right to appeal an order denying a motion to compel arbitration.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.