Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 9-101 (2026)
Facts judicially noticed.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Facts judicially noticed.
Courts take judicial notice of the following facts:
1. The true signification of all English words and phrases, and of legal expressions.
2. Whatever is established by law.
3. Public and private official acts of the legislative, executive and judicial departments of this state and of the United States.
4. The seals of all the courts of this state and of the United States.
5. The accession to office and the official signatures and seals of office of the principal officers of government in the legislative, executive and judicial departments of this state and of the United States.
6. The existence, title, national flag, and seal of every state or sovereign recognized by the executive power of the United States.
7. The seals of courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and of notaries public.
8. The laws of nature, the measure of time, and the geographical divisions and political history of the world. In all these cases the court may resort for its aid to appropriate books or documents of reference.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1937–2024 · leading case: State v. Kellogg, 636 P.2d 750 (Idaho 1981).
State v. Kellogg, 636 P.2d 750 (Idaho 1981). “Judicial notice of that fact was appropriate under I.C. § 9-101(3) as noticing an official act of the state legislature.”
State v. Bryann Kristine Lemmons, 354 P.3d 1186 (Idaho 2015). “44(d) and Idaho Code § 9-101 .” Id. More significantly, if Justice Jones is correct, Lemmons’ conviction should be vacated.”
State v. Doe, 195 P.3d 745 (Idaho Ct. App. 2008). “Pursuant to Idaho Code § 9-101 , a court may take judicial notice of the following facts: (2) Whatever is established by law.”
Hays v. State, 747 P.2d 758 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987). “The record of official acts by the United States District Court for Idaho, of which we may take judicial notice under I.C. § 9-101 and I.R.E. 201, show the following.”
State v. Henderson, 756 P.2d 1057 (Idaho 1988). “(Emphasis added). [2] Idaho Traffic Accident Analysis 1986, Idaho Transportation Department.”
AgStar Fin. Servs., ACA v. Gordon Paving Co., 391 P.3d 1287 (Idaho 2017). “This necessarily impairs the debtor’s credit to that extent; and it was the evident intention of the Legislature, by enacting section 9-101 [former Idaho Code section 6-101], to require the creditor to proceed for collection of the debt (if not paid in due course) against the…”
Marcher v. Butler, 749 P.2d 486 (Idaho 1988). “Section 9-101 of the Idaho Code deals with judicial notice of legislative facts.”
State Ex Rel. Evans v. Click, 631 P.2d 614 (Idaho 1981). “I.C. § 9-101(3). There being substantial questions of law and fact involved in such an allegation, 5 the rationale behind the rule that we will not consider previously unraised issues becomes readily apparent.”
City of Lewiston v. Frary, 420 P.2d 805 (Idaho 1966). “The court in that case relied upon the terms of the statute, I.C. § 9-101 (now a rule of this court, see appendix vol.”
Reifsteck v. Lantern Motel & Cafe, 619 P.2d 1152 (Idaho 1980). “§ 33-2304, it should take judicial notice of the letter, pursuant to I.C. § 9-101(3). This Court finds substantial competent evidence to support the findings and award of the Commission.”
Rich v. Williams, 341 P.2d 432 (Idaho 1959). “” Those minutes of a joint meeting of the committees, January 5, 1959, show investigations and studies made, relating to the necessity for the office building referred to in Chapter 83, by a firm of management consultants, and by engineer personnel and plaintiff directors.”
Quinn v. J.R. Simplot Co., 955 P.2d 1097 (Idaho 1998). “” Hence, although Simplot referred to the regulations, Simplot did not present evidence of these OSHA regulations, nor did it seek to introduce the regulations in *322 the proceeding before the appeals examiner. Consequently, these regulations were not part of the appeals…”
— Idaho Code § 9-101(2) — 1 case
State v. Doe, 195 P.3d 745 (Idaho Ct. App. 2008). “Pursuant to Idaho Code § 9-101 , a court may take judicial notice of the following facts: (2) Whatever is established by law.”
— Idaho Code § 9-101(3) — 7 cases
State v. Kellogg, 636 P.2d 750 (Idaho 1981). “Judicial notice of that fact was appropriate under I.C. § 9-101(3) as noticing an official act of the state legislature.”
State Ex Rel. Evans v. Click, 631 P.2d 614 (Idaho 1981). “I.C. § 9-101(3). There being substantial questions of law and fact involved in such an allegation, 5 the rationale behind the rule that we will not consider previously unraised issues becomes readily apparent.”
Reifsteck v. Lantern Motel & Cafe, 619 P.2d 1152 (Idaho 1980). “§ 33-2304, it should take judicial notice of the letter, pursuant to I.C. § 9-101(3). This Court finds substantial competent evidence to support the findings and award of the Commission.”
Rich v. Williams, 341 P.2d 432 (Idaho 1959). “” Those minutes of a joint meeting of the committees, January 5, 1959, show investigations and studies made, relating to the necessity for the office building referred to in Chapter 83, by a firm of management consultants, and by engineer personnel and plaintiff directors.”
Hine, SSA 519 50 2042 v. Twin Falls Cnty., 755 P.2d 1282 (Idaho 1988).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.