Interpreters.
In any civil or criminal action in which any witness or a party does not understand or speak the English language, or who has a physical disability which prevents him from fully hearing or speaking the English language, then the court shall appoint a qualified interpreter to interpret the proceedings to and the testimony of such witness or party. Upon appointment of such interpreter, the court may have the interpreter served with a subpoena as other witnesses, and such interpreter shall be sworn to accurately and fully interpret the testimony given at the hearing or trial to the best of his ability before assuming his duties as an interpreter. The court shall determine a reasonable fee for all such interpreter services which shall be paid out of the district court fund.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases, 1991–2011 · leading case:
State v. Alsanea, 69 P.3d 153 (Idaho Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Alsanea, 69 P.3d 153 (Idaho Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “The right to an interpreter is codified in I.C. § 9-205 and I.C.R. 28. The language used by both the statute and the rule is nearly identical and provides that in an action in which any witness or party does not understand or speak the English language, the court shall appoint a…”
State v. Hernandez, 820 P.2d 380 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “Idaho Criminal Rule 28 and I.C. § 9-205 are nearly identical and require that in any action in which any party or witness does not understand or speak the English language, or who has a physical handicap which prevents him from fully hearing or *788 speaking the English…”
State v. Puente-Gomez, 827 P.2d 715 (Idaho Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 4× “Idaho Code § 9-205 provides that a court shall appoint a qualified interpreter when a party or witness to a criminal action does not understand or speak English.”
Murillo v. State, 163 P.3d 238 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “See I.C. § 9-205,1.C.R. 28, and I.C.A.R. 52. 2 .”
State v. Herrera, 233 P.3d 147 (Idaho Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 4× “the court shall appoint a qualified interpreter to interpret the proceedings to and the testimony of such witness or party____ Idaho Criminal Rule 28 similarly provides: In any criminal action in which any witness or a party does not understand or speak the English language .”
In Re Hobart, 452 B.R. 789 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2011).
· cites it 2× “See Section 9-205. Subsection (a), together with subsection (c), also validates “cross-collateral” clauses under which collateral acquired at any time secures all advances whenever made.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.