20 ILCS 2405/0.01
Short title
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(20 ILCS 2405/0.01)
(from Ch. 23, par. 3429)
Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the
Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities Act.
(Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder
Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder (1999)
“(West 1996)), the Disabled Persons Rehabilitation Act (20 ILCS 2405/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)), the State Finance Act (30 ILCS 105/1 et seq.”
Williams v. Department of Human Services Division of Rehabilitation Services (2020)
“The agency provides vocational rehabilitation services to eligible persons pursuant to the Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities Act (20 ILCS 2405/0.01 et seq. (West 2016)), state regulations for implementing the program, and the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 U.”
Rafti v. Department of Human Services (2020)
“¶ 19 Illinois’s provision of vocational rehabilitation services is governed by the Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities Act (State Act) (20 ILCS 2405/0.01 et seq. (West 2018)), which authorizes the Department to cooperate with the federal government in providing these…”
Rafti v. Department of Human Services (2020)
“¶ 19 Illinois’s provision of vocational rehabilitation services is governed by the Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities Act (State Act) (20 ILCS 2405/0.01 et seq. (West 2018)), which authorizes the Department to cooperate with the federal government in providing these…”
Woodruff v. IDHS (2026)
“Plaintiff applied for an environmental modification to her home through services provided by the Department under the Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities Act (20 ILCS 2405/0.01 et seq. (West 2024)). The Department granted her request.”
Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder (1999)
“(West 1996)), the Disabled Persons Rehabilitation Act (20 ILCS 2405/0.01 et seq .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|