ILCS » Chapter 210 · Act 45

210 ILCS 45/3-101

The Department shall establish a comprehensive system of licensure for facilities in accordance with this Act for the purposes of:     (1) Protecting the health, welfare, and safety of residents; and     (2) Assuring the accountability for reimbursed care provided in certified facilities participating in a federal or State health program

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(210 ILCS 45/3-101) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 4153-101)
    Sec. 3-101. The Department shall establish a comprehensive system of licensure for facilities in accordance with this Act for the purposes of:
    (1) Protecting the health, welfare, and safety of residents; and
    (2) Assuring the accountability for reimbursed care provided in certified facilities participating in a federal or State health program.
(Source: P.A. 83-1530.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2001–2012 · leading case: Eads v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Eads v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc. (2001) illappct “Nursing homes such as ContinuCare are licensed by the State, regulated through the Nursing Home Act (210 ILCS 45/3-101 through 3-807 (West 1998)) and the Illinois Administrative Code (77 Ill.”
UDI 10 v. Department of Public Health (2012) illappct “OPINION ¶1 Plaintiff, UDI #10, LLC, d/b/a Pekin Manor (UDI), appeals from a circuit court order affirming an administrative decision that UDI violated the Nursing Home Care Act (Act) (210 ILCS 45/3-101 et seq. (West 2008)). After an administrative hearing, the Department’s…”
UDI NO. 10, LLC v. Dept. of Public Health (2012) illappct “¶ 1 Plaintiff, UDI #10, LLC, d/b/a Pekin Manor (UDI), appeals from a circuit court order affirming an administrative decision that UDI violated the Nursing Home Care Act (Act) (210 ILCS 45/3-101 et seq. (West 2008)). After an administrative hearing, the Department's director…”
Eads v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc. (2001) illappct “This change supports the Bernier court's analysis that the legislature intended that the statute be broadly construed, envisioning malpractice claims against persons and entities who are not necessarily licensed physicians.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.