ILCS » Chapter 215 · Act 5

215 ILCS 5/143a

Uninsured and hit-and-run motor vehicle coverage

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(215 ILCS 5/143a)
    Sec. 143a. Uninsured and hit-and-run motor vehicle coverage.
    (1) No policy insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for bodily injury or death suffered by any person arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle that is designed for use on public highways and that is either required to be registered in this State or is principally garaged in this State shall be renewed, delivered, or issued for delivery in this State unless coverage is provided therein or supplemental thereto, in limits for bodily injury or death set forth in Section 7-203 of the Illinois Vehicle Code for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles and hit-and-run motor vehicles because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death, resulting therefrom. Uninsured motor vehicle coverage does not apply to bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death resulting therefrom, of an insured while occupying a motor vehicle owned by, or furnished or available for the regular use of the insured, a resident spouse or resident relative, if that motor vehicle is not described in the policy under which a claim is made or is not a newly acquired or replacement motor vehicle covered under the terms of the policy. The limits for any coverage for any vehicle under the policy may not be aggregated with the limits for any similar coverage, whether provided by the same insurer or another insurer, applying to other motor vehicles, for purposes of determining the total limit of insurance coverage available for bodily injury or death suffered by a person in any one crash. No policy shall be renewed, delivered, or issued for delivery in this State unless it is provided therein that any dispute with respect to the coverage and the amount of damages shall be submitted for arbitration to the American Arbitration Association and be subject to its rules for the conduct of arbitration hearings as to all matters except medical opinions. As to medical opinions, if the amount of damages being sought is equal to or less than the amount provided for in Section 7-203 of the Illinois Vehicle Code, then the current American Arbitration Association Rules shall apply. If the amount being sought in an American Arbitration Association case exceeds that amount as set forth in Section 7-203 of the Illinois Vehicle Code, then the Rules of Evidence that apply in the circuit court for placing medical opinions into evidence shall govern. Alternatively, disputes with respect to damages and the coverage shall be determined in the following manner: Upon the insured requesting arbitration, each party to the dispute shall select an arbitrator and the 2 arbitrators so named shall select a third arbitrator. If such arbitrators are not selected within 45 days from such request, either party may request that the arbitration be submitted to the American Arbitration Association. Any decision made by the arbitrators shall be binding for the amount of damages not exceeding $75,000 for bodily injury to or death of any one person, $150,000 for bodily injury to or death of 2 or more persons in any one motor vehicle crash, or the corresponding policy limits for bodily injury or death, whichever is less. All 3-person arbitration cases proceeding in accordance with any uninsured motorist coverage conducted in this State in which the claimant is only seeking monetary damages up to the limits set forth in Section 7-203 of the Illinois Vehicle Code shall be subject to the following rules:
        (A) If at least 60 days' written notice of the
    
intention to offer the following documents in evidence is given to every other party, accompanied by a copy of the document, a party may offer in evidence, without foundation or other proof:
            (1) bills, records, and reports of hospitals,
        
doctors, dentists, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, physical therapists, and other healthcare providers;
            (2) bills for drugs, medical appliances, and
        
prostheses;
            (3) property repair bills or estimates, when
        
identified and itemized setting forth the charges for labor and material used or proposed for use in the repair of the property;
            (4) a report of the rate of earnings and time
        
lost from work or lost compensation prepared by an employer;
            (5) the written opinion of an opinion witness,
        
the deposition of a witness, and the statement of a witness that the witness would be allowed to express if testifying in person, if the opinion or statement is made by affidavit or by certification as provided in Section 1-109 of the Code of Civil Procedure;
            (6) any other document not specifically covered
        
by any of the foregoing provisions that is otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence.
        Any party receiving a notice under this paragraph (A)
    
may apply to the arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, as the case may be, for the issuance of a subpoena directed to the author or maker or custodian of the document that is the subject of the notice, requiring the person subpoenaed to produce copies of any additional documents as may be related to the subject matter of the document that is the subject of the notice. Any such subpoena shall be issued in substantially similar form and served by notice as provided by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 204(a)(4). Any such subpoena shall be returnable not less than 5 days before the arbitration hearing.
        (B) Notwithstanding the provisions of Supreme Court
    
Rule 213(g), a party who proposes to use a written opinion of an expert or opinion witness or the testimony of an expert or opinion witness at the hearing may do so provided a written notice of that intention is given to every other party not less than 60 days prior to the date of hearing, accompanied by a statement containing the identity of the witness, his or her qualifications, the subject matter, the basis of the witness's conclusions, and his or her opinion.
        (C) Any other party may subpoena the author or maker
    
of a document admissible under this subsection, at that party's expense, and examine the author or maker as if under cross-examination. The provisions of Section 2-1101 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall be applicable to arbitration hearings, and it shall be the duty of a party requesting the subpoena to modify the form to show that the appearance is set before an arbitration panel and to give the time and place set for the hearing.
        (D) The provisions of Section 2-1102 of the Code of
    
Civil Procedure shall be applicable to arbitration hearings under this subsection.
    (2) No policy insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle shall be renewed, delivered, or issued for delivery in this State with respect to any private passenger or recreational motor vehicle that is designed for use on public highways and that is either required to be registered in this State or is principally garaged in this State, unless coverage is made available in the amount of the actual cash value of the motor vehicle described in the policy or the corresponding policy limit for uninsured motor vehicle property damage coverage, whichever is less, subject to a maximum $250 deductible, for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles and hit-and-run motor vehicles because of property damage to the motor vehicle described in the policy.
    There shall be no liability imposed under the uninsured motorist property damage coverage required by this subsection if the owner or operator of the at-fault uninsured motor vehicle or hit-and-run motor vehicle cannot be identified. This subsection shall not apply to any policy which does not provide primary motor vehicle liability insurance for liabilities arising from the maintenance, operation, or use of a specifically insured motor vehicle.
    Each insurance company providing motor vehicle property damage liability insurance shall advise applicants of the availability of uninsured motor vehicle property damage coverage, the premium therefor, and provide a brief description of the coverage. That information need be given only once and shall not be required in any subsequent renewal, reinstatement or reissuance, substitute, amended, replacement or supplementary policy. No written rejection shall be required, and the absence of a premium payment for uninsured motor vehicle property damage shall constitute conclusive proof that the applicant or policyholder has elected not to accept uninsured motorist property damage coverage.
    An insurance company issuing uninsured motor vehicle property damage coverage may provide that:
        (i) Property damage losses recoverable thereunder
    
shall be limited to damages caused by the actual physical contact of an uninsured motor vehicle with the insured motor vehicle.
        (ii) There shall be no coverage for loss of use of
    
the insured motor vehicle and no coverage for loss or damage to personal property located in the insured motor vehicle.
        (iii) Any claim submitted shall include the name and
    
address of the owner of the at-fault uninsured motor vehicle, or a registration number and description of the vehicle, or any other available information to establish that there is no applicable motor vehicle property damage liability insurance.
    Any dispute with respect to the coverage and the amount of damages shall be submitted for arbitration to the American Arbitration Association and be subject to its rules for the conduct of arbitration hearings or for determination in the following manner: Upon the insured requesting arbitration, each party to the dispute shall select an arbitrator and the 2 arbitrators so named shall select a third arbitrator. If such arbitrators are not selected within 45 days from such request, either party may request that the arbitration be submitted to the American Arbitration Association. Any arbitration proceeding under this subsection seeking recovery for property damages shall be subject to the following rules:
        (A) If at least 60 days' written notice of the
    
intention to offer the following documents in evidence is given to every other party, accompanied by a copy of the document, a party may offer in evidence, without foundation or other proof:
            (1) property repair bills or estimates, when
        
identified and itemized setting forth the charges for labor and material used or proposed for use in the repair of the property;
            (2) the written opinion of an opinion witness,
        
the deposition of a witness, and the statement of a witness that the witness would be allowed to express if testifying in person, if the opinion or statement is made by affidavit or by certification as provided in Section 1-109 of the Code of Civil Procedure;
            (3) any other document not specifically covered
        
by any of the foregoing provisions that is otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence.
        Any party receiving a notice under this paragraph (A)
    
may apply to the arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, as the case may be, for the issuance of a subpoena directed to the author or maker or custodian of the document that is the subject of the notice, requiring the person subpoenaed to produce copies of any additional documents as may be related to the subject matter of the document that is the subject of the notice. Any such subpoena shall be issued in substantially similar form and served by notice as provided by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 204(a)(4). Any such subpoena shall be returnable not less than 5 days before the arbitration hearing.
        (B) Notwithstanding the provisions of Supreme Court
    
Rule 213(g), a party who proposes to use a written opinion of an expert or opinion witness or the testimony of an expert or opinion witness at the hearing may do so provided a written notice of that intention is given to every other party not less than 60 days prior to the date of hearing, accompanied by a statement containing the identity of the witness, his or her qualifications, the subject matter, the basis of the witness's conclusions, and his or her opinion.
        (C) Any other party may subpoena the author or maker
    
of a document admissible under this subsection, at that party's expense, and examine the author or maker as if under cross-examination. The provisions of Section 2-1101 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall be applicable to arbitration hearings, and it shall be the duty of a party requesting the subpoena to modify the form to show that the appearance is set before an arbitration panel and to give the time and place set for the hearing.
        (D) The provisions of Section 2-1102 of the Code of
    
Civil Procedure shall be applicable to arbitration hearings under this subsection.
    (3) For the purpose of the coverage, the term "uninsured motor vehicle" includes, subject to the terms and conditions of the coverage, a motor vehicle where on, before, or after the date of the crash the liability insurer thereof is unable to make payment with respect to the legal liability of its insured within the limits specified in the policy because of the entry by a court of competent jurisdiction of an order of rehabilitation or liquidation by reason of insolvency on or after the date of the crash. An insurer's extension of coverage, as provided in this subsection, shall be applicable to all crashes occurring after July 1, 1967 during a policy period in which its insured's uninsured motor vehicle coverage is in effect. Nothing in this Section may be construed to prevent any insurer from extending coverage under terms and conditions more favorable to its insureds than is required by this Section.
    (4) In the event of payment to any person under the coverage required by this Section and subject to the terms and conditions of the coverage, the insurer making the payment shall, to the extent thereof, be entitled to the proceeds of any settlement or judgment resulting from the exercise of any rights of recovery of the person against any person or organization legally responsible for the property damage, bodily injury or death for which the payment is made, including the proceeds recoverable from the assets of the insolvent insurer. With respect to payments made by reason of the coverage described in subsection (3), the insurer making such payment shall not be entitled to any right of recovery against the tortfeasor in excess of the proceeds recovered from the assets of the insolvent insurer of the tortfeasor.
    (5) This amendatory Act of 1967 (Laws of Illinois 1967, page 875) shall not be construed to terminate or reduce any insurance coverage or any right of any party under this Code in effect before July 1, 1967. Public Act 86-1155 shall not be construed to terminate or reduce any insurance coverage or any right of any party under this Code in effect before its effective date.
    (6) Failure of the motorist from whom the claimant is legally entitled to recover damages to file the appropriate forms with the Safety Responsibility Section of the Department of Transportation within 120 days of the date of the crash shall create a rebuttable presumption that the motorist was uninsured at the time of the injurious occurrence.
    (7) An insurance carrier may upon good cause require the insured to commence a legal action against the owner or operator of an uninsured motor vehicle before good faith negotiation with the carrier. If the action is commenced at the request of the insurance carrier, the carrier shall pay to the insured, before the action is commenced, all court costs, jury fees and sheriff's fees arising from the action.
    The changes made by Public Act 90-451 apply to all policies of insurance amended, delivered, issued, or renewed on and after January 1, 1998 (the effective date of Public Act 90-451).
    (8) The changes made by Public Act 98-927 apply to all policies of insurance amended, delivered, issued, or renewed on and after January 1, 2015 (the effective date of Public Act 98-927).
(Source: P.A. 102-775, eff. 5-13-22; 102-982, eff. 7-1-23; 103-154, eff. 6-30-23.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 209 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Phoenix Insurance v. Rosen
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Phoenix Insurance v. Rosen (2011) ill · cites it 10× “215 ILCS 5/143a (West 2006). Uninsured-motorist coverage must be provided in an amount equal to the liability coverage, unless the insured specifically rejects such additional coverage.”
Reed v. Farmers Insurance Group (1999) ill · cites it 14× “The plaintiff, Julie Reed, initiated the present action in the circuit court of Tazewell County, seeking a declaration that the arbitration requirement in the uninsured-motorist portion of the automobile insurance policy issued to her by the defendant was unenforceable.”
Schultz v. Illinois Farmers Insurance (2010) ill · cites it 6× “On appeal, the appellate court held that the policy provisions excluding occupants from UIM coverage contravene section 143a — 2 of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/143a — 2 (West 2002)) and are therefore void and unenforceable.”
Cummins v. Country Mutual Insurance (1997) ill · cites it 10× “Country Mutual filed a motion to dismiss" plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1992)), claiming that the at-fault driver’s vehicle was not "underinsured” as defined in the policy and section 143a — 2(4) of the Illinois Insurance…”
Lee v. John Deere Insurance (2003) ill · cites it 6× “Amwoza submitted the completed form to IRE The application form contained no signature line for the person or entity seeking coverage and contained no space for the applicant to indicate rejection of additional uninsured-motorist coverage as required by the Illinois Insurance…”
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Burke (2016) illappct · cites it 5× “Granite State argued that Illinois law was inapplicable because the insurance contract specified that Michigan law would apply and was delivered to Robison in Michigan, so section 143a of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/143a (West 2010)), which required a policy to be…”
DeSaga v. West Bend Mutual Insurance (2009) illappct · cites it 6× “625 ILCS 5/7 — 601(a) (West 2006); 215 ILCS 5/143a, 143a — 2(4) (West 2006).”
MERCURY INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS v. Kim (2005) illappct · cites it 7× “However, the maximum amount payable by the underinsured motorist coverage carrier shall not exceed the amount by which the limits of the underinsured motorist coverage exceeds the limits of the bodily injury liability insurance of the owner or operator of the underinsured motor…”
Wood v. National Liability & Fire Insurance (2001) illappct · cites it 5× “Section 143a— 2(1) of the Illinois Insurance Code (Code) (215 ILCS 5/143a — 2(1) (West 1998)) requires that the amount of uninsured motorist coverage be included in an insurance policy “in an amount equal to the insured’s bodily injury liability limits unless specifically…”
Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance (2005) ill · cites it 2× “See 625 ILCS 5/7-601(a) (West *1186 2000); 215 ILCS 5/143a, 143a-2 (West 2000). If a driver causes an accident which inflicts bodily injury on someone else and the injury is not covered by the driver's motor vehicle liability policy because of an exclusion in the policy, the…”
Nila v. Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest (2000) illappct · cites it 9× “The circuit court found that an automobile insurance policy delivered to Patricia did not include uninsured motorist coverage in an amount equal to the insured’s bodily injury liability limits as required by section 143a — 2 of the Illinois Insurance Code (Code) (215 ILCS 5/143a…”
Harrington v. American Family Mutual Insurance (2002) illappct · cites it 7× “215 ILCS 5/143a — 2 (West 1992). Based on that allegation, plaintiff requested that defendant be ordered to arbitrate the matter as if uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of $1 million was included in the commercial general liability policy and that the court find that…”
Show all 209 citing cases →
— 215 ILCS 5/143a(1) — 29 cases
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Burke (2016) illappct “Granite State argued that Illinois law was inapplicable because the insurance contract specified that Michigan law would apply and was delivered to Robison in Michigan, so section 143a of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/143a (West 2010)), which required a policy to be…”
Country Preferred Insurance Company v. Whitehead (2012) ill
Alshwaiyat v. American Service Insurance Company (2013) illappct
Ryan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (2009) illappct
Yandell v. Church Mut. Ins. Co. (1995) illappct
— 215 ILCS 5/143a(1)(A) — 1 case
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Rule 23 Order filed June 8, 2001 Motion to publish granted July 13 (2001) illappct
— 215 ILCS 5/143a(2) — 2 cases
Dawson v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. (1994) illappct
Swan v. Country Mutual Insurance (1999) illappct
— 215 ILCS 5/143a(3) — 2 cases
Hasemann v. White (1997) ill
Hasemann v. White (1997) ill
— 215 ILCS 5/143a(4) — 4 cases
Cummins v. Country Mutual Insurance (1996) illappct
Banes v. Western States Ins. Co. (1993) illappct
Harrington v. American Family Mutual Insurance (2002) illappct “215 ILCS 5/143a — 2 (West 1992). Based on that allegation, plaintiff requested that defendant be ordered to arbitrate the matter as if uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of $1 million was included in the commercial general liability policy and that the court find that…”
Banes v. Western States Insurance (1993) illappct
— 215 ILCS 5/143a(l) — 15 cases
Phoenix Insurance v. Rosen (2011) ill “215 ILCS 5/143a (West 2006). Uninsured-motorist coverage must be provided in an amount equal to the liability coverage, unless the insured specifically rejects such additional coverage.”
Rohe Ex Rel. Rohe v. CNA Ins. Co. (2000) illappct
Norris v. National Union Fire Insurance (2006) illappct
American Service Insurance v. Passarelli (2001) illappct
Samek v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance (2003) illappct
— 215 ILCS 5/143a(l)(A) — 1 case
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (2001) illappct
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.