Illinois Compiled Statutes

225 ILCS 720/1.01 (2026)

Short Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 720/1.01) (from Ch. 96 1/2, par. 7901.01)
    Sec. 1.01. Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Surface Coal Mining Land Conservation and Reclamation Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1475.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1994–2010 · leading case: Citizens Org. Proj. v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 727 N.E.2d 195 (Ill. 2000).
Citizens Org. Proj. v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 727 N.E.2d 195 (Ill. 2000). · cites it 2× “The permit procedures were governed by the Surface Coal Mining Land Conservation and Reclamation Act (225 ILCS 720/1.01 et seq. (West 1996)). Pursuant to section 2.”
People Ex Rel. Morse v. E & B COAL CO., 634 N.E.2d 436 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “(now 225 ILCS 720/1.01 et seq. (West 1992))). Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment of the circuit court of Williamson County in favor of defendant, Margaret Chamness, and an order dismissing the action against defendant, Edward Everly, for lack of personal jurisdiction.”
Illinois Mine Subsidence Ins. Fund v. Peabody Coal Co., 383 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (C.D. Ill. 2005). “It asserts that a clear and unquestioned common law duty to provide subjacent support for the dominant surface property codified by the Illinois legislature in 1980 (Surface Coal Mining Land Conservation and Reclamation Act, 225 ILCS 720/1.01 et seq.) does not constitute an…”
Midland Coal Co. v. Knox Cnty., 644 N.E.2d 796 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “February 1, 1994). The Department first argues the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to transfer the action on forum non conveniens grounds.”
Citizens Opposing Pollution v. Exxonmobil Coal U.S.A., 936 N.E.2d 181 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Counts I through IV are directed against Exxon and contend that Exxon violated various provisions of the Surface Coal Mining Land Conservation and Reclamation Act (Act) (225 ILCS 720/1.01 et seq. (West 2008)). Count V is directed against the Agency and also alleges a violation…”
Citizens Opposing Pollution v. ExxonMobil Coal U.S.A. (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Counts I through IV are directed against Exxon and contend that Exxon violated various provisions of the Surface Coal Mining Land Conservation and Reclamation Act (Act) (225 ILCS 720/1.01 et seq. (West 2008)). Count V is directed against the Agency and also alleges a violation…”
Citizens Org. Proj. v. Dept. of Nat. Resources (Ill. 2000). “The permit procedures were governed by the Surface Coal Mining Land Conservation and Reclamation Act (225 ILCS 720/1.01 et seq. (West 1996)). Pursuant to section 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.