Illinois Compiled Statutes

225 ILCS 85/37 (2026)

In the event of a conflict between any provision of this Act and the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act, the provisions of this Act shall govern

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 85/37) (from Ch. 111, par. 4157)
    (Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2028)
    Sec. 37. In the event of a conflict between any provision of this Act and the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act, the provisions of this Act shall govern.
(Source: P.A. 85-796.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–2003 · leading case: Suarez v. Pierard, 663 N.E.2d 1039 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996).
Suarez v. Pierard, 663 N.E.2d 1039 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 2× “See 225 ILCS 85/37 (West 1992). We find nothing in the Pharmacy Act indicating that the legislature intended to make pharmacists subject to the Confidentiality Act.”
In re Marriage of Peters-Farrell, 802 N.E.2d 1250 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “See 225 ILCS 85/37 (West 2000). He points out that under section 3(p) of the Pharmacy Act, a pharmacist may release confidential information to a person authorized by law to receive such information and that a person serving a subpoena is authorized by law to receive the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.