ILCS » Chapter 35 · Act 200
Illinois Compiled Statutes

35 ILCS 200/21-390 (2026)

Effect of receipt of redemption money, forfeiture, withdrawal or return of certificate

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(35 ILCS 200/21-390)
    Sec. 21-390. Effect of receipt of redemption money, forfeiture, withdrawal or return of certificate. The receipt of the redemption money on any property by any purchaser or assignee, on account of any forfeiture or withdrawal, or the return of the certificate of purchase, withdrawal or forfeiture for cancellation, shall operate as a release of the claim to the property under, or by virtue of, the purchase, withdrawal or forfeiture. However, when a certificate of purchase has been recorded in the office of the county recorder by any city, incorporated town or village with 1,000,000 or more inhabitants in which the property is situated, the recording of a certificate by the County Clerk, reciting the cancellation of the certificate of purchase on the tax judgment, sale, redemption and forfeiture record, shall operate as a release of the lien of the city, incorporated town, or village under the certificate of purchase.
(Source: P.A. 83-358; 88-455.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: In Re Cnty. Treasurer, 813 N.E.2d 1101 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Cnty. Treasurer, 813 N.E.2d 1101 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 4× “Section 21-390 of the Tax Code also provides, pertinently: "The receipt of the redemption money on any property by any purchaser or assignee, on account of any forfeiture or withdrawal, or the return of the certificate of purchase, withdrawal or forfeiture for cancellation,…”
In re Woodruff, 600 B.R. 616 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2019). · cites it 2× “35 ILCS 200/21-390 ("The receipt of the redemption money .”
As-Is Props., Ltd. v. Street (In Re Application for a Tax Deed), 2018 IL App (5th) 170170 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “2d 618 ; see also 35 ILCS 200/21-390 (West 2016) ; Goshinsky , 186 Ill.”
AP Props., Inc. v. Rattner, 960 N.E.2d 618 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “35 ILCS 200/21-390 (West 2010); Goshinsky, 186 Ill.”
In re Robinson, 577 B.R. 294 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2017). “35 ILCS 200/21-390 (“The receipt of the redemption money ,.”
Blue v. Town of Lake Bldg. Corp. (In Re Blue), 247 B.R. 748 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2000). “35 ILCS 200/21-390 (West 1996). There is no scenario under which the tax purchaser could have a right to receive a payment from the property owner.”
In re Application for a Tax Deed, 2018 IL App (5th) 170170 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “” Rattner, 2011 IL App (2d) 110061, ¶ 13 ; see also 35 ILCS 200/21-390 (West 2016); Goshinsky, 186 Ill.”
In re Application for a Tax Deed, 2018 IL App (5th) 170170 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “” Rattner, 2011 IL App (2d) 110061, ¶ 13 ; see also 35 ILCS 200/21-390 (West 2016); Goshinsky, 186 Ill.”
In re Application of the Cnty. Treasurer, 2025 IL App (1st) 232444-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). · cites it 4× “” 35 ILCS 200/21-390 (West 2022). -4- No. 1-23-2444 A unique question of statutory interpretation is presented by the circumstances of this case, specifically the impact of a tax purchaser’s acceptance of a statutorily mandated tender of redemption money on the jurisdiction of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.