ILCS » Chapter 35 · Act 505

35 ILCS 505/1

For the purposes of this Act the terms set out in the Sections following this Section and preceding Section 2 have the meanings ascribed to them in those Sections

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(35 ILCS 505/1) (from Ch. 120, par. 417)
    Sec. 1. For the purposes of this Act the terms set out in the Sections following this Section and preceding Section 2 have the meanings ascribed to them in those Sections.
(Source: P.A. 98-756, eff. 7-16-14.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1996–2011 · leading case: Valstad Ex Rel. Valstad Quarry, Inc. v. Cipriano
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Valstad Ex Rel. Valstad Quarry, Inc. v. Cipriano (2005) illappct · cites it 2× “01 through 15 (West 2002)), (2) the State Finance Act (30 ILCS 105/1 through 40 (West 2002)), (3) the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act (35 ILCS 120/1 through 14 (West 2002)), (4) the Motor Fuel Tax Law (35 ILCS 505/1 through 21 (West 2002)), (5) the Nursing Home Care Act (210 ILCS…”
Wirtz v. Quinn (2011) ill “*Page 6 ¶ 24 Section 930 amends the Motor Fuel Tax Law ( 35 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2008)) to increase the amount of money to be transferred from the Motor Fuel Tax Fund to the Grade Crossing Protection Fund.”
Wirtz v. Quinn (2011) ill “¶ 24 Section 930 amends the Motor Fuel Tax Law (35 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2008)) to increase the amount of money to be transferred from the Motor Fuel Tax Fund to the Grade Crossing Protection Fund.”
City of Carbondale v. Bower (2002) illappct “(West 2000)) and under the Motor Fuel Tax Law (35 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2000)). The statutes require that the amount of funds distributed to the city through the State Revenue Sharing Act and under the Motor Fuel Tax Law be based upon the latest census conducted by the…”
People v. Schram (1996) illappct “(now 35 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1994))) (hereinafter referred to as the IMFTA), which provides criminal penalties for the nonpayment of taxes in various transactions involving the purchase and sale of motor fuel and for the sale or distribution of motor fuel without a license.”
Moran Transportation Corp. v. Stroger (1999) illappct “d in finding that plaintiffs lacked standing to attack the constitutionality of the Ordinance; (2) the trial court erred in finding that certain trial testimony clearly established the constitutionality of the Ordinance; (3) the trial court erred in giving consideration to…”
City of Carbondale v. Bower (2002) illappct “(West 2000)) and under the Motor Fuel Tax Law (35 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2000)). The statutes require that the amount of funds distributed to the city through the State Revenue Sharing Act and under the Motor Fuel Tax Law be based upon the latest census conducted by the…”
Valstad v. Cipriano (2005) illappct “01 through 15 (West 2002)), (2) the State Finance Act (30 ILCS 105/1 through 40 (West 2002)), (3) the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act (35 ILCS 120/1 through 14 (West 2002)), (4) the Motor Fuel Tax Law (35 ILCS 505/1 through 21 (West 2002)), (5) the Nursing Home Care Act (210 ILCS…”
Moran Transortation Corp. v. Stroger (1999) illappct “it unconstitutionally vague; (5) the Ordinance's railroad locomotive fuel exemption renders it unconstitutionally vague; (6) the trial court wrongly rejected plaintiffs' uniformity clause claim; (7) the trial court wrongly rejected plaintiffs' special legislation and equal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.