ILCS » Chapter 40 · Act 5

40 ILCS 5/1-101.3

Party in interest

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(40 ILCS 5/1-101.3)
    Sec. 1-101.3. Party in interest. A person is a "party in interest" with respect to a pension fund or retirement system established under this Code if the person is:
        (1) a fiduciary, counsel, or employee of the pension
    
fund or retirement system, or a relative of such a person;
        (2) a person providing services to the pension fund
    
or retirement system, or a relative of such a person;
        (3) an employer, any of whose employees are covered
    
by the pension fund or retirement system;
        (4) an employee organization, any members of which
    
are covered by the pension fund or retirement system; or
        (5) an employee, officer, or director (or an
    
individual having powers or responsibilities similar to those of an officer or director) of the pension fund or retirement system or of a person described under item (2), (3), or (4) of this Section.
(Source: P.A. 90-507, eff. 8-22-97.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: City of East Peoria v. Melton
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of East Peoria v. Melton (2023) illappct “3 of the Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/1-101.3 (West 2020)), the City was a “ ‘party in interest’ ” to the administrative proceeding.”
Village of Stickney v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund (2004) illappct · cites it 2× “The Village contends it has the right to participate as a "party in interest" (see 40 ILCS 5/1-101.3 (West 2002)) with a financial stake in the Board's decisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.