ILCS » Chapter 40 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

40 ILCS 5/7-200 (2026)

To carry on other duties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(40 ILCS 5/7-200) (from Ch. 108 1/2, par. 7-200)
    Sec. 7-200. To carry on other duties.
    To carry on generally any other reasonable activities, including, without limitation, the making of administrative decisions on participation and coverage, which are necessary for carrying out the intent of this fund in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
(Source: Laws 1963, p. 161.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2021 · leading case: Ultsch v. Illinois Mun. Ret. Fund, 874 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ultsch v. Illinois Mun. Ret. Fund, 874 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2007). “, keeping permanent records of Board proceedings and other records "necessary or desirable for administration of the Fund" (40 ILCS 5/7-197 (West 2004)), and "carry[ing] on generally any other reasonable activities, including, without limitation, the making of administrative…”
Prazen v. Shoop, 2013 IL 115035 (Ill. 2013). · cites it 2× “See 40 ILCS 5/7-200 (West 2010). The Board also relies upon the general fiduciary duty on the part of the boards of all Illinois pension funds to act prudently in accordance with the provisions of the Pension Code.”
Stevens v. Vill. of Oak Brook, 2013 IL App (2d) 120456 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “” 40 ILCS 5/7-200 (West 2010). The Board has adopted the “Authorized Agent’s Manual,” which it uses to provide guidance to IMRF employers such as the Village.”
Prazen v. Shoop, 2012 IL App (4th) 120048 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2× “(40 ILCS 5/7-200). [(3)] The ability of the Board to determine whether or not [plaintiff] is an employee is irrelevant to this proceeding because no such determination is being made.”
In re Marriage of Wehr, 2021 IL App (2d) 200726 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). ““Although the IMRF is not an administrative agency and does not have formal regulations promulgated under the Illinois Administrative Code, its board of trustees (Board) has authority to make ‘administrative decisions on participation and coverage, which are necessary for…”
Prazen v. Shoop, 2013 IL 115035 (Ill. 2013). “See 40 ILCS 5/7-200 (West 2010). We agree with the appellate court that creating a new condition for forfeiture—of which the annuitant has no notice from the clear terms of the statute itself—is not a reasonable activity.”
Penn v. The Cnty. of Peoria (, 2018 IL App (3d) 170162 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “¶ 50 However, most importantly, section 7-200 of the Illinois Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/7-200 (West 2016)) clearly states that the IMRF’s Board of Trustees, not the County, shall have the power “[t]o carry on generally any other reasonable activities, including, without…”
Penn v. The Cnty. of Peoria, Illinois (, 2018 IL App (3d) 170162 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “¶ 50 However, most importantly, section 7-200 of the Illinois Pension Code ( 40 ILCS 5/7-200 (West 2016) ) clearly states that the IMRF's Board of Trustees, not the County, shall have the power "[t]o carry on generally any other reasonable activities, including, without…”
Klomann v. Ill. Mun. Ret. Fund (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 2× “Section 7-135 of the Pension Code provides for the appointment of an agent to "certify to the fund whether or not a given person is authorized to participate in the fund.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.