ILCS » Chapter 5 · Act 100
Illinois Compiled Statutes

5 ILCS 100/10-65 (2026)

Licenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 100/10-65) (from Ch. 127, par. 1010-65)
    Sec. 10-65. Licenses.
    (a) When any licensing is required by law to be preceded by notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the provisions of this Act concerning contested cases shall apply.
    (b) When a licensee has made timely and sufficient application for the renewal of a license or a new license with reference to any activity of a continuing nature, the existing license shall continue in full force and effect until the final agency decision on the application has been made unless a later date is fixed by order of a reviewing court.
    (c) An application for a new license shall include the applicant's social security number, which shall be retained in the agency's records pertaining to the license. As soon as practical, an agency must assign a customer identification number to each applicant for a license that the applicant may use in place of his or her social security number on the application for a license or renewal of a license. A licensee's social security number shall not appear on the face of his or her license. Each agency shall require the licensee to certify on the application form, under penalty of perjury, that he or she is not more than 30 days delinquent in complying with a child support order. Every application shall state that failure to so certify shall result in disciplinary action, and that making a false statement may subject the licensee to contempt of court. The agency shall notify each applicant or licensee who acknowledges a delinquency or who, contrary to his or her certification, is found to be delinquent or who after receiving notice, fails to comply with a subpoena or warrant relating to a paternity or a child support proceeding, that the agency intends to take disciplinary action. Accordingly, the agency shall provide written notice of the facts or conduct upon which the agency will rely to support its proposed action and the applicant or licensee shall be given an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Act concerning contested cases. Any delinquency in complying with a child support order can be remedied by arranging for payment of past due and current support. Any failure to comply with a subpoena or warrant relating to a paternity or child support proceeding can be remedied by complying with the subpoena or warrant. Upon a final finding of delinquency or failure to comply with a subpoena or warrant, the agency shall suspend, revoke, or refuse to issue or renew the license. In cases in which the Department of Healthcare and Family Services (formerly Department of Public Aid) has previously determined that an applicant or a licensee is more than 30 days delinquent in the payment of child support and has subsequently certified the delinquency to the licensing agency, and in cases in which a court has previously determined that an applicant or licensee has been in violation of the Non-Support Punishment Act for more than 60 days, the licensing agency shall refuse to issue or renew or shall revoke or suspend that person's license based solely upon the certification of delinquency made by the Department of Healthcare and Family Services (formerly Department of Public Aid) or the certification of violation made by the court. Further process, hearings, or redetermination of the delinquency or violation by the licensing agency shall not be required. The licensing agency may issue or renew a license if the licensee has arranged for payment of past and current child support obligations in a manner satisfactory to the Department of Healthcare and Family Services (formerly Department of Public Aid) or the court. The licensing agency may impose conditions, restrictions, or disciplinary action upon that license.
    (d) Except as provided in subsection (c), no agency shall revoke, suspend, annul, withdraw, amend materially, or refuse to renew any valid license without first giving written notice to the licensee of the facts or conduct upon which the agency will rely to support its proposed action and an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the provisions of this Act concerning contested cases. At the hearing, the licensee shall have the right to show compliance with all lawful requirements for the retention, continuation, or renewal of the license. If, however, the agency finds that the public interest, safety, or welfare imperatively requires emergency action, and if the agency incorporates a finding to that effect in its order, summary suspension of a license may be ordered pending proceedings for revocation or other action. Those proceedings shall be promptly instituted and determined.
    (e) Any application for renewal of a license that contains required and relevant information, data, material, or circumstances that were not contained in an application for the existing license shall be subject to the provisions of subsection (a).
(Source: P.A. 96-328, eff. 8-11-09; 97-400, eff. 1-1-12.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Morgan v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 903 N.E.2d 799 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Morgan v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 903 N.E.2d 799 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 3× “* * * If, however, the agency finds that the public interest, safety, or welfare imperatively requires emergency action, and if the agency incorporates a finding to that effect in its order, summary suspension of a license may be ordered pending proceedings for revocation or…”
Illinois Educ. Ass'n v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 762 N.E.2d 1190 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 2× “The letter requests an opinion from the Attorney General as to whether the Board and/or the Illinois Teacher Certification Board has decision-making authority relative to the determination of delinquency in child support payments called for in section 10-65 of the Illinois…”
Doxsie v. Illinois Gaming Bd., 2021 IL App (1st) 191875 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 3× “1-19-1875 entitled to an administrative hearing and that she is statutorily entitled to an administrative hearing “pursuant to Section 10-65(d) (5 ILCS 100/10-65(d)) of the Administrative Procedure Act.”
Doxsie v. Illinois Gaming Bd., 2021 IL App (1st) 191875 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “¶9 Following a hearing on count I, the plaintiff’s administrative review claim, the circuit court entered an order on August 20, 2019, finding that the plaintiff made a prima facie case that she is entitled to an administrative hearing and that she is statutorily entitled to an…”
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “" 5 ILCS 100/10-65(a) (West 2012). Here, the denial of a terminal operator's license is not required by law to be preceded by notice and a hearing; rather, the Board can deny an application for a terminal operator's license without ever holding a hearing.”
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “” 5 ILCS 100/10-65(a) (West 2012). Here, the denial of a terminal operator’s license is not required by law to be preceded by notice and a hearing; rather, the Board can deny an application for a terminal operator’s license without ever holding a hearing.”
Wilson v. Kalelkar (N.D. Ill. 2022). · cites it 2× “48:3–15; 225 ILCS 60/37(d); 5 ILCS 100/10-65(d)).) Stewart seeks summary judgment on three grounds.”
MPower Energy NJ v. Illinois Com. Comm'n (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). “Count III alleged section 4-204 failed to comply with section 10-65 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act) (5 ILCS 100/10-65 (West 2024)). In its prayers for relief, the supplemental amended complaint asked for a declaratory judgment stating that section 4-204 of the…”
Lake Cnty. Riverboat L.P. v. Illinois Gaming Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “See 5 ILCS 100/10-65(b) (West 2000). Whether a stay would have been granted is a question we are in no position to answer.”
Emerald Casino, Inc. v. Illinois Gaming Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “See 5 ILCS 100/10-65(b) (West 2004). Therefore, the June 29 Resolution, if valid, does not render the Emerald decision moot.”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-65(a) — 2 cases
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “" 5 ILCS 100/10-65(a) (West 2012). Here, the denial of a terminal operator's license is not required by law to be preceded by notice and a hearing; rather, the Board can deny an application for a terminal operator's license without ever holding a hearing.”
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “” 5 ILCS 100/10-65(a) (West 2012). Here, the denial of a terminal operator’s license is not required by law to be preceded by notice and a hearing; rather, the Board can deny an application for a terminal operator’s license without ever holding a hearing.”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-65(b) — 2 cases
Lake Cnty. Riverboat L.P. v. Illinois Gaming Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “See 5 ILCS 100/10-65(b) (West 2000). Whether a stay would have been granted is a question we are in no position to answer.”
Emerald Casino, Inc. v. Illinois Gaming Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “See 5 ILCS 100/10-65(b) (West 2004). Therefore, the June 29 Resolution, if valid, does not render the Emerald decision moot.”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-65(d) — 4 cases
Morgan v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 903 N.E.2d 799 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “* * * If, however, the agency finds that the public interest, safety, or welfare imperatively requires emergency action, and if the agency incorporates a finding to that effect in its order, summary suspension of a license may be ordered pending proceedings for revocation or…”
Doxsie v. Illinois Gaming Bd., 2021 IL App (1st) 191875 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “1-19-1875 entitled to an administrative hearing and that she is statutorily entitled to an administrative hearing “pursuant to Section 10-65(d) (5 ILCS 100/10-65(d)) of the Administrative Procedure Act.”
Doxsie v. Illinois Gaming Bd., 2021 IL App (1st) 191875 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “¶9 Following a hearing on count I, the plaintiff’s administrative review claim, the circuit court entered an order on August 20, 2019, finding that the plaintiff made a prima facie case that she is entitled to an administrative hearing and that she is statutorily entitled to an…”
Wilson v. Kalelkar (N.D. Ill. 2022). “48:3–15; 225 ILCS 60/37(d); 5 ILCS 100/10-65(d)).) Stewart seeks summary judgment on three grounds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.