ILCS » Chapter 510 · Act 77
Illinois Compiled Statutes

510 ILCS 77/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(510 ILCS 77/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Livestock Management Facilities Act.
(Source: P.A. 89-456, eff. 5-21-96.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1998–2017 · leading case: Helping Others Maintain Env't Standards v. Bos, 941 N.E.2d 347 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Helping Others Maintain Env't Standards v. Bos, 941 N.E.2d 347 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Bos sought the Department’s approval of the dairies pursuant to the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Livestock Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2008)). In accordance with the Livestock Act, the Department sent notice of the intent to construct to the Jo Daviess County Board…”
Cnty. of Knox Ex Rel. Masterson v. Highlands, L.L.C., 723 N.E.2d 256 (Ill. 1999). “We note that the appellate court additionally referred to the Livestock Management Facilities Act (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1998) (effective May 21, 1996)) to bolster its conclusion that a county lacks the power to assert zoning authority over land used for agricultural…”
Rochester Buckhart Action Grp. v. Young, 887 N.E.2d 49 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “In May 2007, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction on count I of the complaint citing the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 through 999 (West 2006)). Plaintiff stated the Act provided minimum setbacks, stiffer design requirements, and an…”
Nickels v. Burnett, 798 N.E.2d 817 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Defendants contend that the trial court erroneously ruled on the petition for a preliminary injunction without first requiring plaintiffs to exhaust their administrative remedies pursuant to the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2002)). We…”
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bible Pork, Inc., 2015 IL App (5th) 140211 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Construction of such a facility requires compliance with the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2004)) and numerous other state regulations and requirements.”
Cnty. of Knox Ex Rel. Masterson v. Highlands, L.L.C., 705 N.E.2d 128 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “In its brief amicus curiae, the Illinois Agricultural Association directs this court’s attention to a new act entitled the Livestock Management Facilities Act (the Livestock Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1996)). This Act became effective on May 21, 1996.”
Rochester Buckhart Action Grp. v. Young, 914 N.E.2d 1251 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “In May 2007, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction on count I of the complaint citing the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 through 999 (West 2006)). Plaintiff stated the Act provided minimum setbacks, stiffer design requirements, and an…”
Pilotto v. Urban Outfitters West, L.L.C., 2016 IL App (1st) 160844 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “3d 669, 687 (2010) (the plaintiff could pursue a common law cause of action such as nuisance that would have the same effect as implying a private right of action under the Livestock Management Facilities Act (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2008))). In the case before us, the only…”
Save Our Sandy v. The Dep't of Agric., 2016 IL App (4th) 150582 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “In October 2014, the Department determined the proposed hog farm "more likely than not" met the requirements of the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Livestock Act or Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 to 999 (West 2014)). In February 2015, plaintiff, Save Our Sandy, filed a petition for…”
Pilotto v. Urban Outfitters West, L.L.C., 2016 IL App (1st) 160844 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “3d 669, 687 (2010) (the plaintiff could pursue a common law cause of action such as nuisance that would have the same effect as implying a private right of action under the Livestock Management Facilities Act (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2008))). In the case before us, the only…”
Nickels v. Burnett (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Defendants contend that the trial court erroneously ruled on the petition for a preliminary injunction without first requiring plaintiffs to exhaust their administrative remedies pursuant to the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 2002)). We…”
Rochester Buckhart Action Grp. v. Young (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “In May 2007, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction on count I of the complaint citing the Livestock Management Facilities Act (Act) (510 ILCS 77/1 through 999 (West 2006)). Plaintiff stated the Act provided minimum setbacks, stiffer design requirements, and an…”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.