620 ILCS 65/15

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(620 ILCS 65/15); O'Hare Modernization Act; Chicago; for the
    
O'Hare modernization program, including quick-take power.
(620 ILCS 75/2-15 and 75/2-90); Public-Private Agreements for
    
the South Suburban Airport Act; Department of Transportation; for South Suburban Airport purposes.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2008–2010 · leading case: Village of Bensenville v. City of Chicago
Village of Bensenville v. City of Chicago (2009) illappct · cites it 3× “620 ILCS 65/15 (West 2006). The Act allows acquisition of property “that [Chicago] reasonably determines will be necessary for future use, regardless of whether final regulatory or funding decisions have been made.”
City of Chicago v. St. John's United Church of Christ (2010) illappct “” 620 ILCS 65/15 (West 2004). The Modernization Act amended various other state acts, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Religious Freedom Act) (775 ILCS 35/1 et seq.”
City of Chicago v. Prologis (2008) illappct “See 620 ILCS 65/15 (West 2006). It stated that the City exercised its authority to do so when it instituted the condemnation action in April 2006 to acquire the private real property owned by ProLogis and noted that since the City’s complaint omitted the intervenors’ bonds as…”
Village of Bensenville v. City of Chicago (2009) illappct · cites it 2× “) 620 ILCS 65/15 (West 2006). The Act also contains a broad preemption clause providing: "Airport property shall not be subject to the laws of any unit of local government except as provided by ordinance of [Chicago].”
City of Chicago v. St. John's United Church of Christ (2010) illappct “" 620 ILCS 65/15 (West 2004). The Modernization Act amended various other state acts, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Religious Freedom Act ) (775 ILCS 35/1 et seq.”
City of Chicago v. Prologis (2008) illappct “See 620 ILCS 65/15 (West 2006). It stated that the City exercised its authority to do so when it instituted the condemnation action in April 2006 to acquire the private real property owned by ProLogis and noted that since the City's complaint omitted the intervenors' bonds as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.