625 ILCS 5/11-1204
Stop and yield signs
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 5/11-1204)
(from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-1204)
Sec. 11-1204. Stop and yield signs. (a) Preferential right-of-way at an intersection may be indicated by stop signs or yield signs as authorized in Section 11-302 of this Act. (b) Except when directed to proceed by a police officer or traffic control signal, every driver of a vehicle and every motorman of a streetcar approaching a stop intersection indicated by a stop sign shall stop at a clearly marked stop line, but if none, before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection, or if none, then at the point nearest the intersection roadway where the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway before entering the intersection. (c) The driver of a vehicle approaching a yield sign if required for safety to stop shall stop before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection or, in the event there is no crosswalk, at a clearly marked stop line, but if none, then at the point nearest the intersecting roadway where the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway.(Source: P.A. 103-706, eff. 1-1-25.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: United States v. Forest Norville
United States v. Forest Norville (2022)
“” 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b). An evidentiary hearing was thus required, Norville argues, to de- termine where in the intersection he was required to stop and whether he “truly” ran the stop sign.”
People v. Staton (1993)
“11-1204(b) (now 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) (West 1992))), illegal operation of a snowmobile (Ill.”
People v. Grabeck (2011)
“On December 21, 2009, defendant was observed speeding (625 ILCS 5/11-601(b) (West 2008)), disobeying a stop sign (625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) (West 2008)), and allegedly driving under the influence of drugs (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(4) (West 2008)).”
People v. Allen (2012)
“OPINION ¶1 In January 2011, after a bench trial, defendant, Loyd Dale Allen, was found guilty in absentia of driving under the influence (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(2) (West 2010)), disobeying a stop sign (625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) (West 2010)), improper lane usage (625 ILCS…”
Pyles v. Police Department (2022)
“It lists Terry Pyles as the defendant and “Disregarding Stop Sign / 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b)” as the offense. (Id.”
People v. Irby (2021)
“See 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) (West 2016). After viewing the video recording of the stop several times, the court asserted that “[n]o one can see the lines from that distance.”
People v. Fields (2026)
“1(a) (West 2022)), driving on a revoked license (625 ILCS 5/6-303 (West 2022)), reckless driving (625 ILCS 5/11-503(a)(1) (West 2022)), illegal transportation or possession of alcohol (625 ILCS 5/11-502(a) (West 2022)), driving without lights when required (625 ILCS 5/12-201(b)…”
— 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) — 7 cases
United States v. Forest Norville (2022)
“” 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b). An evidentiary hearing was thus required, Norville argues, to de- termine where in the intersection he was required to stop and whether he “truly” ran the stop sign.”
People v. Staton (1993)
“11-1204(b) (now 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) (West 1992))), illegal operation of a snowmobile (Ill.”
People v. Grabeck (2011)
“On December 21, 2009, defendant was observed speeding (625 ILCS 5/11-601(b) (West 2008)), disobeying a stop sign (625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) (West 2008)), and allegedly driving under the influence of drugs (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(4) (West 2008)).”
People v. Allen (2012)
“OPINION ¶1 In January 2011, after a bench trial, defendant, Loyd Dale Allen, was found guilty in absentia of driving under the influence (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(2) (West 2010)), disobeying a stop sign (625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b) (West 2010)), improper lane usage (625 ILCS…”
Pyles v. Police Department (2022)
“It lists Terry Pyles as the defendant and “Disregarding Stop Sign / 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b)” as the offense. (Id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|