Illinois Compiled Statutes

625 ILCS 5/7-602 (2026)

Insurance card

✓ current as of May 2026 Cite as: 625 ILCS 5/7-602 (2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 5/7-602) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 7-602)
    Sec. 7-602. Insurance card. Every operator of a motor vehicle subject to Section 7-601 of this Code shall carry within the vehicle evidence of insurance. The evidence shall be legible and sufficient to demonstrate that the motor vehicle currently is covered by a liability insurance policy as required under Section 7-601 of this Code and may include, but is not limited to, the following:
        (a) an insurance card provided by the insurer under
    
this Section;
        (b) the combination of proof of purchase of the motor
    
vehicle within the previous 60 days and a current insurance card issued for the motor vehicle replaced by such purchase;
        (c) the current declarations page of a liability
    
insurance policy;
        (d) a liability insurance binder, certificate of
    
liability insurance or receipt for payment to an insurer or its authorized representative for a liability insurance premium, provided such document contains all information the Secretary of State by rule and regulation may require;
        (e) a current rental agreement;
        (f) registration plates or digital registration
    
plates, registration sticker or digital registration sticker, or other evidence of registration issued by the Secretary only upon submission of proof of liability insurance pursuant to this Code;
        (g) a certificate, decal, or other document or device
    
issued by a governmental agency for a motor vehicle indicating the vehicle is insured for liability pursuant to law;
        (h) the display of electronic images on a cellular
    
phone or other type of portable electronic device. The use of a cellular phone or other type of portable electronic device to display proof of insurance does not constitute consent for a law enforcement officer, court, or other officer of the court to access other contents of the electronic device. Any law enforcement officer, court, or officer of the court presented with the device shall be immune from any liability resulting from damage to the mobile electronic device.
    An insurance card shall be provided for each motor vehicle insured by the insurer issuing the liability insurance policy and may be issued in either paper or electronic format. Acceptable electronic formats shall permit display on a cellular phone or other portable electronic device and satisfy all other requirements of law and rule, including this Section, regarding form and content.
    The form, contents and manner of issuance of the insurance card shall be prescribed by rules and regulations of the Secretary of State. The Secretary shall adopt rules requiring that reasonable measures be taken to prevent the fraudulent production of insurance cards. The insurance card shall display an effective date and an expiration date covering a period of time not to exceed 12 months. The insurance card shall contain the following disclaimer: "Examine policy exclusions carefully. This form does not constitute any part of your insurance policy." If the insurance policy represented by the insurance card does not cover any driver operating the motor vehicle with the owner's permission, or the owner when operating a motor vehicle other than the vehicle for which the policy is issued, the insurance card shall contain a warning of such limitations in the coverage provided by the policy.
    No insurer shall issue a card, similar in appearance, form and content to the insurance card required under this Section, in connection with an insurance policy that does not provide the liability insurance coverage required under Section 7-601 of this Code.
    The evidence of insurance shall be displayed upon request made by any law enforcement officer wearing a uniform or displaying a badge or other sign of authority. Any person who fails or refuses to comply with such request is in violation of Section 3-707 of this Code. Any person who displays evidence of insurance, knowing there is no valid liability insurance in effect on the motor vehicle as required under Section 7-601 of this Code or knowing the evidence of insurance is illegally altered, counterfeit or otherwise invalid, is in violation of Section 3-710 of this Code.
    "Display" means the manual surrender of the evidence of insurance into the hands of the law enforcement officer, court, or officer of the court making the request for the officer's, court's, or officer of the court's inspection thereof.
(Source: P.A. 101-395, eff. 8-16-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1995–2023 · leading case: Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance (2005) ill · cites it 2× “To the contrary, the Illinois Safety and Family Financial Responsibility Law clearly contemplates that exclusions may be included in policies and that those exclusions will be upheld.”
People v. Nash (2011) illappct · cites it 2× “No person shall operate a motor vehicle designed to be used on a public highway unless the vehicle is covered by a liability insurance policy (625 ILCS 5/7-601(a), 3-707(a) (West 2008)), and every operator of such a motor vehicle shall carry within the vehicle evidence of…”
American Service Insurance Company v. Arive (2012) illappct · cites it 3× “Relying on section 7-602 of the Illinois Vehicle Code (the Code) (625 ILCS 5/7-602 (West 2008)), which provides that an insurance card “shall contain a warning” of any named-driver exclusion, Arive argues that a named-driver exclusion is void if the excluded driver’s name does…”
Steinberg v. Universal UnderWriters Insurance (1995) illappct “(625 ILCS 5/7-602 (West 1992).) Probably an insured driver operating an otherwise uninsured vehicle is not subject to penalty under section 3-707 of the Code (625 ILCS 5/3-707 (West 1992)), but the owner is in violation and his registration could be suspended under section 7-606…”
American Access Casualty Company v. Reyes (2013) ill · cites it 2× “” 625 ILCS 5/7-602 (West 2010). American Access argues that section 7-602 allows exclusion of “any” driver.”
American Access Casualty Co. v. Reyes (2014) ill “” 625 ILCS 5/7-602 (West 2010). American Access argues that section 7-602 allows exclusion of “any” driver.”
Thounsavath v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (2017) illappct “July 1, 1989) (adding 625 ILCS 5/7-602). We disagree with State Farm’s premise that the enactment of mandatory insurance would have rendered the cases relied on by the plaintiff inapplicable because exclusions are now authorized.”
Muhammad v. Adams Family Trucking (2023) illappct · cites it 3× “See 625 ILCS 5/7-602 (West 2020) (“Every operator of a motor vehicle *** shall carry within the vehicle evidence of insurance.”
People v. O'Brien (2000) illappct “For example, under sections 7-602 (display of false insurance) and 7-603 (making or selling invalid or counterfeit insurance cards) (625 ILCS 5/7-602, 7-603 (West 1998)), knowledge is required; and violation of section 7-602 is a Class A misdemeanor and violation of section…”
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Smith (2003) illappct · cites it 3× “625 ILCS 5/7-602 (West 1996). We agree. Section 7-602 of the Code discusses the requirements for insurance cards and provides in relevant part: "If the insurance policy represented by the insurance card does not cover any driver operating the motor vehicle with the owner's…”
People v. O'BRIEN (2000) illappct “For example, under sections 7-602 (display of false insurance) and 7-603 (making or selling invalid or counterfeit insurance cards) (625 ILCS 5/7-602, 7-603 (West 1998)), knowledge is required; and violation of section 7-602 is a Class A misdemeanor and violation of section…”
Thounsavath v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (2017) illappct “July 1, 1989) (adding 625 ILCS 5/7-602). We disagree with State Farm’s premise that the enactment of mandatory insurance would have rendered the cases relied on by the plaintiff inapplicable because exclusions are now authorized.”
— 625 ILCS 5/7-602(a) — 1 case
American Access Casualty Company v. Reyes (2013) ill “” 625 ILCS 5/7-602 (West 2010). American Access argues that section 7-602 allows exclusion of “any” driver.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.