ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 105
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 105/27.2a (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 105/27.2a) (from Ch. 25, par. 27.2a)
    Sec. 27.2a. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 100-173, eff. 1-1-18. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: People v. Carter, 877 N.E.2d 446 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Carter, 877 N.E.2d 446 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 6× “00 for filing a petition to vacate, modify, or reconsider final judgment pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2004). In satisfaction of this assessment, the Illinois Department of Corrections shall collect a first time payment of 50% of the average monthly balance of…”
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 4× “” 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(g)(2) (West 2004). From this, it is clear that, contrary to defendant’s contention here, the trial court did have the authority to order him to pay the $90 filing fee once it determined his postconviction petition was frivolous.”
People v. Irvine, 882 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 3× “2a(w)(1)(E) of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(E) (West 2004)), because the defendant was charged in a misdemeanor complaint but was not charged with a minor traffic or ordinance violation.”
Gassman v. The Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook Cnty., 2017 IL App (1st) 151738 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “” 705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2012). The Act further provides that “[i]n those instances where a minimum and maximum fee is stated, the clerk of the circuit court must charge the minimum fee listed and may charge up to the maximum fee if the county board has by resolution increased…”
People v. Sparks, 913 N.E.2d 692 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 3× “2a of the Illinois Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2006)). This appeal followed.”
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 4× “" 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(g)(2) (West 2004). *184 From this, it is clear that, contrary to defendant's contention here, the trial court did have the authority to order him to pay the $90 filing fee once it determined his postconviction petition was frivolous.”
People v. Smith, 892 N.E.2d 55 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “2a 1 of the Illinois Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2006)). Defendant argues that she is not subject to the filing fee for two reasons: (1) she was denied leave to file her successive postconviction petition, and (2) there is no statutory filing fee for…”
People v. Jarrett, 927 N.E.2d 754 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “2a of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2006)). CONCLUSION Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court, but vacate that portion of the trial court’s September 5, 2007, order imposing $50 in State’s Attorney’s fees and direct the clerk of the circuit…”
People v. Jones-Beard, 2019 IL App (1st) 162005 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “Specifically, Jones-Beard identifies the following charges as fines subject to offset by his presentence incarceration credit: the $190 felony complaint fee (705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(A) (West 2016)), the $15 clerk automation fee (id.”
People v. Irvine, 882 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 3× “BACKGROUND Defendant was arrested near the intersection of Belmont and Clark Streets in Chicago following an altercation with Niya White and charged in a misdemeanor complaint with one count of domestic battery in violation of section 12-3.”
People v. Johnson, 2019 IL App (1st) 161104 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “Clark, 2018 IL 122495 , defendant withdraws his challenge on appeal to the following charges: the $190 felony complaint filed charge (705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(A) (West 2014)), the $2 Public Defender Records Automation Fund charge (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014)), the $2 State’s…”
Lee v. Pucinski, 642 N.E.2d 769 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 3× “2a(k)(5) (now 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(k)(5) (West 1992))) is unconstitutional; and (2) recovery of the fees paid under the statute.”
Show all 49 citing cases →
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(dd) — 2 cases
Illinois State Treausrer v. Illinois Workers' Comp. Comm'n, 2015 IL 117418 (Ill. 2015).
Illinois State Treausrer v. Illinois Workers' Comp. Comm'n, 2015 IL 117418 (Ill. 2015).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(e) — 1 case
Grant-Hall v. Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC, 856 F. Supp. 2d 929 (N.D. Ill. 2012).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(g) — 6 cases
Gassman v. The Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook Cnty., 2017 IL App (1st) 151738 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2012). The Act further provides that “[i]n those instances where a minimum and maximum fee is stated, the clerk of the circuit court must charge the minimum fee listed and may charge up to the maximum fee if the county board has by resolution increased…”
Midwest Med. Records Ass'n, Inc. v. Brown, 2018 IL App (1st) 163230 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
Midwest Med. Records Ass'n v. Brown, 2018 IL App (1st) 163230 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
Gassman v. Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook Cnty., 2017 IL App (1st) 151738 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
Lurie v. Wolin, 2017 IL App (1st) 161571 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(g)(1) — 1 case
Alderson v. Weinstein, 2018 IL App (2d) 170498 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(g)(2) — 15 cases
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “” 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(g)(2) (West 2004). From this, it is clear that, contrary to defendant’s contention here, the trial court did have the authority to order him to pay the $90 filing fee once it determined his postconviction petition was frivolous.”
People v. Gale, 876 N.E.2d 171 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “" 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(g)(2) (West 2004). *184 From this, it is clear that, contrary to defendant's contention here, the trial court did have the authority to order him to pay the $90 filing fee once it determined his postconviction petition was frivolous.”
People v. Carter, 877 N.E.2d 446 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “00 for filing a petition to vacate, modify, or reconsider final judgment pursuant to 705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2004). In satisfaction of this assessment, the Illinois Department of Corrections shall collect a first time payment of 50% of the average monthly balance of…”
People v. Hunter, 875 N.E.2d 1145 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
People v. Smith, 892 N.E.2d 55 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “2a 1 of the Illinois Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2a (West 2006)). Defendant argues that she is not subject to the filing fee for two reasons: (1) she was denied leave to file her successive postconviction petition, and (2) there is no statutory filing fee for…”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(gg) — 1 case
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495 (Ill. 2018).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(k) — 1 case
Mohammad v. Brown, 2020 IL App (1st) 182454-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(k)(4) — 1 case
Mann v. Brown, 18 F. App'x 399 (7th Cir. 2001).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(k)(5) — 1 case
Lee v. Pucinski, 642 N.E.2d 769 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “2a(k)(5) (now 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(k)(5) (West 1992))) is unconstitutional; and (2) recovery of the fees paid under the statute.”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w) — 2 cases
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(A) — 10 cases
People v. Jones-Beard, 2019 IL App (1st) 162005 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “Specifically, Jones-Beard identifies the following charges as fines subject to offset by his presentence incarceration credit: the $190 felony complaint fee (705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(A) (West 2016)), the $15 clerk automation fee (id.”
People v. Johnson, 2019 IL App (1st) 161104 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “Clark, 2018 IL 122495 , defendant withdraws his challenge on appeal to the following charges: the $190 felony complaint filed charge (705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(A) (West 2014)), the $2 Public Defender Records Automation Fund charge (55 ILCS 5/3-4012 (West 2014)), the $2 State’s…”
People v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 150146 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
People v. Smith, 2018 IL App (1st) 151402 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
People v. Brown, 2018 IL App (1st) 160924 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(B) — 2 cases
People v. Miller, 2018 IL App (1st) 152967 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
People v. Miller, 2018 IL App (1st) 152967 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(E) — 2 cases
People v. Irvine, 882 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “2a(w)(1)(E) of the Clerks of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.2a(w)(1)(E) (West 2004)), because the defendant was charged in a misdemeanor complaint but was not charged with a minor traffic or ordinance violation.”
People v. Irvine, 882 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “BACKGROUND Defendant was arrested near the intersection of Belmont and Clark Streets in Chicago following an altercation with Niya White and charged in a misdemeanor complaint with one count of domestic battery in violation of section 12-3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.