Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 405/1-4.1 (2026)

Except for minors accused of violation of an order of the court, any minor accused of any act under federal or State law, or a municipal ordinance that would not be illegal if committed by an adult, cannot be placed in a jail, municipal lockup, detention center or secure correctional facility

✓ current as of May 2026 Cite as: 705 ILCS 405/1-4.1 (2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/1-4.1) (from Ch. 37, par. 801-4.1)
    Sec. 1-4.1. Except for minors accused of violation of an order of the court, any minor accused of any act under federal or State law, or a municipal ordinance that would not be illegal if committed by an adult, cannot be placed in a jail, municipal lockup, detention center or secure correctional facility. Confinement in a county jail of a minor accused of a violation of an order of the court, or of a minor for whom there is reasonable cause to believe that the minor is a person described in subsection (3) of Section 5-105, shall be in accordance with the restrictions set forth in Sections 5-410 and 5-501 of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 89-656, eff. 1-1-97; 90-590, eff. 1-1-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2004–2014 · leading case: In re Shelby R.
In re Shelby R. (2013) ill · cites it 5× “Alternatively, the State argues that even if the public interest exception applies, the appellate court misconstrued the Act.”
In re Shelby R. (2013) ill · cites it 6× “Alternatively, the State argues that even if the public interest exception applies, the appellate court misconstrued the Act. According to the State, the trial court’s order committing respondent to the Department was proper, pursuant to section 1-4.”
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B. (2004) ill “1 (West 2002) ("any minor accused of any act under federal or State law, or a municipal ordinance that would not be illegal if committed by an adult, cannot be placed in a jail, municipal lockup, detention center or secure correctional facility"); 705 ILCS 405/5-401 (West 2002).…”
Metropolitan Alliance of Police v. Illinois Labor Relations Board (2014) illappct “See also 705 ILCS 405/1-4.1 (West 2010) (distinguishing between detention center and secure correctional facility).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.