ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 405
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 405/5-1 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-1) (from Ch. 37, par. 805-1)
    Sec. 5-1. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 85-601. Repealed by P.A. 90-590, eff. 1-1-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1996–2008 · leading case: People v. Jonathan C.B., 898 N.E.2d 252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Jonathan C.B., 898 N.E.2d 252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “Compare 705 ILCS 405/5-1 et seq. - 50 - (West 1996) with 705 ILCS 405/5-105 et seq.”
In Re Ct, 666 N.E.2d 888 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “1996)) preclude a court from placing a dependent minor aged 13 or over in the custody of DCFS if that minor has ever been adjudicated delinquent under article V of the Juvenile Court Act (705 ILCS 405/5-1 et seq. (West 1994)). We reverse and remand.”
In Re Dd, 728 N.E.2d 119 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “On appeal, the DCFS argues that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and had no authority under the Juvenile Court Act of 1987(Act) (705 ILCS 405/5-1 et seq. (West 1996)) to place D.”
In Re Cb, 898 N.E.2d 252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “Compare 705 ILCS 405/5-1 et seq. (West 1996) with 705 ILCS 405/5-105 et seq.”
People v. Arnold (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “) 705 ILCS 405/5-1 (West 1997). The statute, the legislative history behind the statute and case law indicate that the Act is discretionary rather than mandatory, and that although a trial court judge does not have the ad hoc , unfettered power to impose adult prosecution on a…”
People v. D.T. (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “Those provisions establish an orderly scheme for taking the minor into custody and for retaining the minor in custody while he awaits an adjudicatory hearing. They set forth how the minor is taken into custody, who may take the minor into custody, who files the delinquency…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.