705 ILCS 405/5-13
(Repealed)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-13)
(from Ch. 37, par. 805-13)
Sec. 5-13.
(Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 85-1209. Repealed by P.A. 90-590, eff. 1-1-99.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1993–1998 · leading case: In Interest of Dl
In Interest of Dl (1998)
“705 ILCS 405/5-13(2) (West 1994). If any of these facts are unknown, the petition must allege that they are unknown.”
People v. C.R.H. (1993)
“) The petition “shall allege that the minor is delinquent and set forth *** facts sufficient” to establish that the minor violated or attempted to violate a Federal or State law or a municipal ordinance (see Ill.”
In Interest of CH (1995)
“(705 ILCS 405/5-13(2) (West 1992).) If any of these facts are unknown, the petition must indicate that they are unknown.”
In Re WC (1994)
“805-13, now codified as 705 ILCS 405/5-13 (West 1992)), alleging that respondent was delinquent because on May 28, 1992, he shot and killed Carey Long in the face and back, knowing that such act would cause death (Ill.”
People v. D.T. (1997)
“" 705 ILCS 405/5-9(b) (West 1994). That petition must allege various matters, including facts establishing the delinquency charge and the date set for the detention or shelter care hearing.”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-13(2) — 4 cases
In Interest of Dl (1998)
“705 ILCS 405/5-13(2) (West 1994). If any of these facts are unknown, the petition must allege that they are unknown.”
People v. C.R.H. (1993)
“) The petition “shall allege that the minor is delinquent and set forth *** facts sufficient” to establish that the minor violated or attempted to violate a Federal or State law or a municipal ordinance (see Ill.”
In Interest of CH (1995)
“(705 ILCS 405/5-13(2) (West 1992).) If any of these facts are unknown, the petition must indicate that they are unknown.”
People v. D.T. (1997)
“" 705 ILCS 405/5-9(b) (West 1994). That petition must allege various matters, including facts establishing the delinquency charge and the date set for the detention or shelter care hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|