ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 405
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 405/5-415 (2026)

Setting of detention or shelter care hearing; release

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-415)
    Sec. 5-415. Setting of detention or shelter care hearing; release.
    (1) Unless sooner released, a minor alleged to be a delinquent minor taken into temporary custody must be brought before a judicial officer within 40 hours for a detention or shelter care hearing to determine whether the minor shall be further held in custody. If a minor alleged to be a delinquent minor taken into custody is hospitalized or is receiving treatment for a physical or mental condition, and is unable to be brought before a judicial officer for a detention or shelter care hearing, the 40 hour period will not commence until the minor is released from the hospital or place of treatment. If the minor gives false information to law enforcement officials regarding the minor's identity or age, the 40 hour period will not commence until the court rules that the minor is subject to this Act and not subject to prosecution under the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012. Any other delay attributable to a minor alleged to be a delinquent minor who is taken into temporary custody shall act to toll the 40 hour time period. The 40 hour time period shall be tolled to allow counsel for the minor to prepare for the detention or shelter care hearing, upon a motion filed by such counsel and granted by the court. In all cases, the 40 hour time period is exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and court-designated holidays.
    (2) If the State's Attorney or probation officer (or other public officer designated by the court in a county having more than 3,000,000 inhabitants) determines that the minor should be retained in custody, the probation officer or such other public officer designated by the court shall cause a petition to be filed as provided in Section 5-520 of this Article, and the clerk of the court shall set the matter for hearing on the detention or shelter care hearing calendar. Immediately upon the filing of a petition in the case of a minor retained in custody, the court shall cause counsel to be appointed to represent the minor. When a parent, legal guardian, custodian, or responsible relative is present and so requests, the detention or shelter care hearing shall be held immediately if the court is in session and the State is ready to proceed, otherwise at the earliest feasible time. In no event shall a detention or shelter care hearing be held until the minor has had adequate opportunity to consult with counsel. The probation officer or such other public officer designated by the court in a county having more than 3,000,000 inhabitants shall notify the minor's parent, legal guardian, custodian, or responsible relative of the time and place of the hearing. The notice may be given orally.
    (3) The minor must be released from custody at the expiration of the 40 hour period specified by this Section if not brought before a judicial officer within that period.
    (4) After the initial 40 hour period has lapsed, the court may review the minor's custodial status at any time prior to the trial or sentencing hearing. If during this time period new or additional information becomes available concerning the minor's conduct, the court may conduct a hearing to determine whether the minor should be placed in a detention or shelter care facility. If the court finds that there is probable cause that the minor is a delinquent minor and that it is a matter of immediate and urgent necessity for the protection of the minor or of the person or property of another, or that the minor is likely to flee the jurisdiction of the court, the court may order that the minor be placed in detention or shelter care.
(Source: P.A. 103-22, eff. 8-8-23.)


 
    (705 ILCS 405/Art. V Pt. 5 heading)
PART 5. PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: People v. Luis R., 941 N.E.2d 136 (Ill. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Luis R., 941 N.E.2d 136 (Ill. 2010). “For example, special obligations not applicable in adult criminal proceedings are imposed on the arresting officer (705 ILCS 405/5-405 (West 2008)), pretrial judge (705 ILCS 405/5-501 (West 2008)), the State's Attorney (705 ILCS 405/5-415(2) (West 2008)), and trial judge (705…”
People v. Cooper, 2025 IL 130946 (Ill. 2025). “, 2013 IL 113776, ¶ 20 (deeming 60-day requirement for holding hearing on extended - 12 - juvenile jurisdiction directory where statute did not prohibit late hearing or compel dismissal of motion if time limit breached), with 705 ILCS 405/5-415(3) (West 2022) (setting 40-hour…”
In Re Cj, 764 N.E.2d 1153 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 2× “As we have just noted, in the adult criminal system, probable cause for detention may be determined through a nonadversarial hearing and based on even hearsay or written testimony, not live witnesses, as long as that determinations is fair and reliable.”
In re Angel P., 2014 IL App (1st) 121749 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Judge Lubin denied the motion to dismiss but released the respondent to the custody of his mother because he had not received a hearing within 40 hours as required by section 5-415 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (705 ILCS 405/5-415 (West 2010)). The judge granted defense…”
In re Angel P., 2014 IL App (1st) 121749 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Judge Lubin denied the motion to dismiss but released the respondent to the custody of his mother because he had not received a hearing within 40 hours as required by section 5-415 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (705 ILCS 405/5-415 (West 2010)). The judge granted defense…”
People v. Maxwell, 2025 IL App (3d) 250304 (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “See 705 ILCS 405/5-415 (West 2024). At this juncture, the State had no legal basis to file a petition to deny pretrial release under article 110 of the Code because the custody provisions under the Juvenile Court Act controlled.”
In re Angel P., 2014 IL App (1st) 121749 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Judge Lubin denied the motion to dismiss but released the respondent to the custody of his mother because he had not received a hearing within 40 hours as required by section 5-415 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (705 ILCS 405/5-415 (West 2010)). The judge granted defense…”
In re Angel P., 2014 IL App (1st) 121749 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Judge Lubin denied the motion to dismiss but released the respondent to the custody of his mother because he had not received a hearing within 40 hours as required by section 5-415 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (705 ILCS 405/5-415 (West 2010)). The judge granted defense…”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-415(1) — 1 case
In Re Cj, 764 N.E.2d 1153 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “As we have just noted, in the adult criminal system, probable cause for detention may be determined through a nonadversarial hearing and based on even hearsay or written testimony, not live witnesses, as long as that determinations is fair and reliable.”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-415(2) — 2 cases
People v. Luis R., 941 N.E.2d 136 (Ill. 2010). “For example, special obligations not applicable in adult criminal proceedings are imposed on the arresting officer (705 ILCS 405/5-405 (West 2008)), pretrial judge (705 ILCS 405/5-501 (West 2008)), the State's Attorney (705 ILCS 405/5-415(2) (West 2008)), and trial judge (705…”
In Re Cj, 764 N.E.2d 1153 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “As we have just noted, in the adult criminal system, probable cause for detention may be determined through a nonadversarial hearing and based on even hearsay or written testimony, not live witnesses, as long as that determinations is fair and reliable.”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-415(3) — 1 case
People v. Cooper, 2025 IL 130946 (Ill. 2025). “, 2013 IL 113776, ¶ 20 (deeming 60-day requirement for holding hearing on extended - 12 - juvenile jurisdiction directory where statute did not prohibit late hearing or compel dismissal of motion if time limit breached), with 705 ILCS 405/5-415(3) (West 2022) (setting 40-hour…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.