ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 405
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 405/5-9 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-9) (from Ch. 37, par. 805-9)
    Sec. 5-9. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 85-1443. Repealed by P.A. 90-590, eff. 1-1-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1997 · leading case: In Re Wj, 672 N.E.2d 778 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Wj, 672 N.E.2d 778 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “Section 5-10 hearings must be held within 36 hours after the minor is taken into custody (705 ILCS 405/5-9 (West 1994)), and encompass the following: "At the appearance of the minor before the court at the detention or shelter care hearing, all witnesses present shall be…”
People v. D.T. (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 6× “Section 5-9 of the Juvenile Court Act mandates that if the minor is not brought to court for a detention hearing before the expiration of 36 hours from the time the minor was taken into temporary custody, he must be released.”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-9(1) — 1 case
People v. D.T. (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “Section 5-9 of the Juvenile Court Act mandates that if the minor is not brought to court for a detention hearing before the expiration of 36 hours from the time the minor was taken into temporary custody, he must be released.”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-9(3) — 1 case
People v. D.T. (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “Section 5-9 of the Juvenile Court Act mandates that if the minor is not brought to court for a detention hearing before the expiration of 36 hours from the time the minor was taken into temporary custody, he must be released.”
— 705 ILCS 405/5-9(b) — 1 case
People v. D.T. (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “Section 5-9 of the Juvenile Court Act mandates that if the minor is not brought to court for a detention hearing before the expiration of 36 hours from the time the minor was taken into temporary custody, he must be released.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.