ILCS » Chapter 735 · Act 110

735 ILCS 110/30

Construction of Act

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 110/30)
    Sec. 30. Construction of Act.
    (a) Nothing in this Act shall limit or preclude any rights the moving party may have under any other constitutional, statutory, case or common law, or rule provisions.
    (b) This Act shall be construed liberally to effectuate its purposes and intent fully.
(Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2023 · leading case: Wright Development Group, LLC v. Walsh
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wright Development Group, LLC v. Walsh (2010) ill · cites it 4× “" 735 ILCS 110/30 (West 2008). This clearly applies to Walsh's statement to a reporter made during a public forum concerning proposed legislation targeting condominium conversions.”
Shoreline Towers Condominium Association v. Gassman (2010) illappct · cites it 4× “” 735 ILCS 110/30 (West 2008). There is no distinct formula for determining whether a particular lawsuit is a SLAPP suit.”
Sandholm v. Kuecker (2012) ill · cites it 2× “¶ 40 Section 25 provides that the court "shall award a moving party who prevails in a motion under this Act reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with the motion.”
Sandholm v. Kuecker (2012) ill “¶ 40 Section 25 provides that the court “shall award a moving party who prevails in a motion under this Act reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in connection with the motion.”
Sandholm v. Kuecker (2010) illappct · cites it 2× “” 735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2008). Section 5 of the Act sets forth its purpose and intent in significant depth.”
August v. Hanlon (2012) illappct · cites it 3× “559 , 573 (2008)) and that the legislature has mandated that the Act be liberally construed (735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2010)). ¶5 The initial complaint in this case was filed on November 22, 2006.”
Hytel Group, Inc. v. Butler (2010) illappct “735 ILCS 110/5 (West 2008) (“The information, reports, opinions, claims, arguments, and other expressions provided by citizens are vital to *** the operation of government *** and the continuation of representative democracy”).”
Kainrath v. Grider (2018) illappct “" 735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2014). ¶ 25 Under the Act, a defendant may move "to dispose of a claim in a judicial proceeding" on the grounds that (1) he engaged in an act "in furtherance of [his] rights of petition, speech, association, or to otherwise participate in government"…”
Ryan v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) illappct “” 735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2010). ¶ 15 As can be seen from the legislature’s public policy statement, the Act seeks not only to protect individuals from meritless, retaliatory SLAPPs but also to allow plaintiffs who have legitimately been wronged to receive compensation.”
Glorioso v. Sun-Times Media Holdings, LLC (2023) illappct “” 735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2020). In deciding whether a lawsuit should be dismissed pursuant to the Act, a court must first determine whether the suit is the type of suit the Act was intended to address.”
Wright Development Group v. Walsh (2010) ill · cites it 2× “” -15- 735 ILCS 110/30 (West 2008). This clearly applies to Walsh’s statement to a reporter made during a public forum concerning proposed legislation targeting condominium conversions.”
Sandholm v. Kuecker (2010) illappct · cites it 2× “" 735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2008). Section 5 of the Act sets forth its purpose and intent in significant depth.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— 735 ILCS 110/30(b) — 13 cases
Sandholm v. Kuecker (2012) ill “¶ 40 Section 25 provides that the court "shall award a moving party who prevails in a motion under this Act reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with the motion.”
Sandholm v. Kuecker (2012) ill “¶ 40 Section 25 provides that the court “shall award a moving party who prevails in a motion under this Act reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in connection with the motion.”
Wright Development Group, LLC v. Walsh (2010) ill “" 735 ILCS 110/30 (West 2008). This clearly applies to Walsh's statement to a reporter made during a public forum concerning proposed legislation targeting condominium conversions.”
Sandholm v. Kuecker (2010) illappct “” 735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2008). Section 5 of the Act sets forth its purpose and intent in significant depth.”
August v. Hanlon (2012) illappct “559 , 573 (2008)) and that the legislature has mandated that the Act be liberally construed (735 ILCS 110/30(b) (West 2010)). ¶5 The initial complaint in this case was filed on November 22, 2006.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.