735 ILCS 5/9-101
Forcible entry prohibited
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/9-101)
(from Ch. 110, par. 9-101)
Sec. 9-101.
Forcible entry prohibited.
No person shall make an
entry into lands or tenements except in cases where entry is allowed by
law, and in such cases he or she shall not enter with force, but in a peaceable
manner.
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 109
cases (35 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Bozek v. Bank of America, N.A.
Bozek v. Bank of America, N.A. (2021)
“Matthews, 2018 IL App (1st) 172141 , ¶ 20 (actions under Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2016)) are justiciable).”
In the Matter of Margaret WILLIAMS, Debtor-Appellee, Appeal of CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY (1998)
“an action under Illinois’ Forcible Entry and Detainer Act, 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq., against Williams in the Cook County (Illinois) Circuit Court seeking to evict her.”
2460-68 Clark, LLC v. Chopo Chicken, LLP (2022)
“1-21-0119 “special statutory proceeding” and that therefore a party seeking to recover possession of a premises must strictly comply with the statutory requirements of the act formerly known as the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (Act) (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2020); see…”
Sherwood Commons Townhome Owners Ass'n v. DuBois (2020)
“Count I sought possession of the defendant’s unit, alleging that, pursuant to the former Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2018); see also Pub.”
North Spaulding Condominium Assoc v. Cavanaugh (2017)
“(West 2014)) and the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2014)) set forth the procedures available to a condominium association for recovering unpaid assessments.”
In Re Sumpter (1994)
“Like many Illinois contracts for deed, paragraph 21 of the Agreement *840 contained alternative provisions and remedies for default by the Buyers, which included the Creditors’ rights to forfeit the Buyers’ rights under the Agreement, and a right to maintain an action to recover…”
Wells Fargo Bank v. Watson (2012)
“, brought suit pursuant to the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2010)) against defendant, Cecil W.”
Dzevad Hurem v. Nickolas Tavares (2015)
“See 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. This law prohibits anyone from entering property by force and provides a cause of action to those who are “entitled to the possession of lands or tenements” against those without such entitlement who occupy the owner’s property.”
U.S. Bank National Association v. Luckett (2013)
“Bank filed a new action under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2010)) claiming that it was entitled to possession of the property from Luckett and Wilson.”
Spanish Court Two Condominium Association v. Carlson (2014)
“¶2 BACKGROUND ¶3 In February 2010, in the circuit court of Lake County, plaintiff, Spanish Court Two Condominium Association (Spanish Court), filed a complaint under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (forcible statute) (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2008)) against defendant,…”
Kupper v. Powers (2017)
“” 3 ¶4 On January 29, 2014, plaintiffs filed a two-count complaint seeking (1) possession of the premises under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (735 ILCS 5/9-101 et seq. (West 2014)) and (2) rent for the use and occupation of the premises after forfeiture of the Agreement.”
Corlis v. Edelberg (2018)
“JUSTICE GRIFFIN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion ¶ 1 Plaintiff Lance Corlis filed an eviction action against defendant Johana Edelberg in the circuit court of Cook County seeking an order of possession and a money judgment under the Forcible Entry and Detainer…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|