ILCS » Chapter 750 · Act 28
Illinois Compiled Statutes

750 ILCS 28/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 28/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Income Withholding for Support Act.
(Source: P.A. 90-673, eff. 1-1-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: Rozsavolgyi v. The City of Aurora, 2017 IL 121048 (Ill. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rozsavolgyi v. The City of Aurora, 2017 IL 121048 (Ill. 2017). “3d 155 (applying the Tort Immunity Act to a nontort claim under the Income Withholding for Support Act ( 750 ILCS 28/1 et seq. (West 2010))). ¶ 60 The trial court found, and I agree, that the state of the law on this issue is uncertain and lacking in clear direction.”
In Re Marriage of Gulla & Kanaval, 917 N.E.2d 392 (Ill. 2009). “The circuit court calculated Knobias’ penalty for violating its income withholding notice based on section 35(a) of the Withholding Act (750 ILCS 28/35(a) (West 2006)).”
In Re Marriage of Vaughn, 935 N.E.2d 123 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “Vaughn (Jill), filed a complaint *125 against third-party respondent, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois (Blue Cross), for its failure to comply with the Income Withholding for Support Act (the Withholding Act) (750 ILCS 28/1 et seq. (West 2006)). Pursuant to section 2-619 of…”
In re Marriage of Thompson, 829 N.E.2d 419 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “The respondent points out that the legislature has defined the term “order for support” in the Income Withholding for Support Act (750 ILCS 28/1 et seq. (West 2002)) as “any order of the court which provides for periodic payment of funds for the support of a child *** and…”
Giles v. Gen. Motors Corp., 802 N.E.2d 858 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Clair County under the Income Withholding for Support Act (Act) (750 ILCS 28/1 et seq. (West 2000)). The order set forth a termination date for withholding; nevertheless, GM withheld for 2V2 years beyond that date.”
In Re Marriage of Stockton, 937 N.E.2d 657 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “In 1994, the court entered a withholding order under the Income Withholding for Support Act (Withholding Act) (750 ILCS 28/1 et seq. (West 2006)), mandating Rockwell to withhold $60 per week from John’s income.”
In Re Marriage of Heady, 924 N.E.2d 1187 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “59 was a proper amount to withhold from Michael’s employment income pursuant to the Income Withholding for Support Act (750 ILCS 28/1 et seq. (West 2006)). Be that as it may, given counsel’s insistence that the Department have the unrestricted right to collect past-due support,…”
In re Marriage of Murray, 2014 IL App (2d) 121253 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “To facilitate the payments, the court ordered Jeffrey’s employer, the McHenry County conservation district (Conservation District), to withhold and forward the payments from Jeffrey’s paychecks pursuant to the Income Withholding for Support Act (Withholding Act) (750 ILCS 28/1…”
In re Marriage of Murray, 2014 IL App (2d) 121253 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “To facilitate the payments, the court ordered Jeffrey’s employer, the McHenry County conservation district (Conservation District), to withhold and forward the payments from Jeffrey’s paychecks pursuant to the Income Withholding for Support Act (Withholding Act) (750 ILCS 28/1…”
Blair v. Supportkids, Inc., 222 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (N.D. Ill. 2002). · cites it 2× “, d/b/a Child Support Enforcement (“CSE”) and Richard “Casey” Hoffman, alleging that Defen *1040 dants maliciously and fraudulently sent Plaintiffs’ employers simulated order/notices requiring income withholding pursuant to the Illinois Income Withholding for Support Act, 750…”
In re Marriage of Bradley, 2013 IL App (5th) 100217 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “She argues that Timothy is an employee of ARPSI and that the corporation was properly served pursuant to the Income Withholding for Support Act (750 ILCS 28/1 to 999 (West 2010)). The record fails to indicate any action being taken by the corporation.”
Crank v. Crank, 871 N.E.2d 962 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 3× “2 Further, the addition to section 505(g — 5) cited by Gary as support for his contention that the circuit court may not increase periodic payment amounts posttermination to satisfy arrearages states as follows: “If there is an unpaid arrearage or delinquency (as those terms are…”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.