ILCS » Chapter 750 · Act 36
Illinois Compiled Statutes

750 ILCS 36/105 (2026)

International Application Of Act

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 36/105)
    Sec. 105. International Application Of Act.
    (a) A court of this State shall treat a foreign country as if it were a state of the United States for the purpose of applying Articles 1 and 2.
    (b) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c), a child-custody determination made in a foreign country under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this Act must be recognized and enforced under Article 3.
    (c) A court of this State need not apply this Act if the child custody law of a foreign country violates fundamental principles of human rights.
(Source: P.A. 93-108, eff. 1-1-04.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: In re Marriage of Akula, 935 N.E.2d 1070 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Marriage of Akula, 935 N.E.2d 1070 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2010). · cites it 3× “The circuit court also ruled that the proceedings in the Indian family court in Hyderabad were not being conducted in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of the UCCJEA, rendering the Indian court’s orders unrecognizable and unenforceable under section 105 of…”
In re Marriage of Akula, No. 1-10-1084 Rel (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. Aug. 25, 2010). · cites it 2× “The circuit court also ruled that the proceedings in the Indian family court in Hyderabad were not being conducted in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of the UCCJEA, rendering the Indian court's orders unrecognizable and unenforceable under section 105 of…”
750 ILCS 36/105(c): 1 case
In re Marriage of Akula, 935 N.E.2d 1070 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2010). “The circuit court also ruled that the proceedings in the Indian family court in Hyderabad were not being conducted in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of the UCCJEA, rendering the Indian court’s orders unrecognizable and unenforceable under section 105 of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.