ILCS » Chapter 750 · Act 5

750 ILCS 5/603

(Repealed)

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 5/603) (from Ch. 40, par. 603)
    Sec. 603. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 97-659, eff. 6-1-12. Repealed by P.A. 99-90, eff. 1-1-16.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Petition of Kirchner
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Petition of Kirchner (1995) ill · cites it 4× “Section 601(b)(2) of the Marriage Act provides that a "child custody proceeding is commenced * * * by a person other than a parent, by filing a petition for custody of the child in the county in which he is permanently resident or found, but only if he is not in the physical…”
In Re Marriage of Kostusik (2005) illappct · cites it 3× “A temporary custody order pursuant to section 603(a) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 2004)), by its very nature, is not a final, appealable order.”
In Re Marriage of Fields (1996) illappct · cites it 2× “” 750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 1994). The trial court may award temporary custody under the best-interest-of-the-child standard set forth in section 602 of the Act (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 1994)) after a hearing or based solely on affidavits (if the parties do not object).”
In Re Marriage of Gilbert (2004) illappct · cites it 3× “In effect, the Domestic Violence Act could be used as a short cut which would effectuate an ex parte change of status which would modify the status quo ante.”
In Re Marriage of Hefer (1996) illappct “750 ILCS 5/603 (West 1994). A court may consider the period of time that a child has spent with a parent by virtue of a temporary custody order (Wurm v.”
In re Marriage of Oehm (1993) illappct “603(a) (now 750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 1992)).) Section 602 of the Act requires that the court “determine custody-in accordance with the best interest of the child.”
In re Marriage of Harris (2015) illappct “The comments further suggest that the applicability of Rule 304(b)(6) is limited to permanent custody determinations “as distinguished from any temporary or interim orders of custody entered pursuant to section 603 of the Act (750 ILCS 5/603) and any orders modifying child…”
In re Marriage of Adler (2020) illappct · cites it 2× “750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 2014); 750 ILCS 5/603.”
In re Marriage of Kostusik (2005) illappct · cites it 3× “A temporary custody order pursuant to section 603(a) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 2004)), by its very nature, is not a final, appealable order.”
In re Marriage of Gilbert (2004) illappct · cites it 2× “(750 ILCS 5/610(b) (West 2000)); (750 ILCS 5/601(c) & (d)(West 2000)); (750 ILCS 5/603 (West 2000)). This is not so under the Domestic Violence Act.”
In re Marriage of Polk (2020) illappct “An allocation of parental responsibilities judgment under Rule 304(b)(6) refers to “the trial court’s permanent determination of custody entered incident to the dissolution of marriage, as distinguished from any temporary or interim orders of custody entered pursuant to section…”
In re Marriage of Georgikos (2026) illappct “2(b); 750 ILCS 5/603/10(a) (West 2024) (requiring the court to enter orders necessary to protect the child if it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a parent engaged in any conduct that seriously endangered the 13 child’s mental, moral or physical health or…”
— 750 ILCS 5/603(a) — 5 cases
In Re Marriage of Kostusik (2005) illappct “A temporary custody order pursuant to section 603(a) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 2004)), by its very nature, is not a final, appealable order.”
In Re Marriage of Fields (1996) illappct “” 750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 1994). The trial court may award temporary custody under the best-interest-of-the-child standard set forth in section 602 of the Act (750 ILCS 5/602 (West 1994)) after a hearing or based solely on affidavits (if the parties do not object).”
In re Marriage of Oehm (1993) illappct “603(a) (now 750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 1992)).) Section 602 of the Act requires that the court “determine custody-in accordance with the best interest of the child.”
In re Marriage of Adler (2020) illappct “750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 2014); 750 ILCS 5/603.”
In re Marriage of Kostusik (2005) illappct “A temporary custody order pursuant to section 603(a) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/603(a) (West 2004)), by its very nature, is not a final, appealable order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.