ILCS » Chapter 810 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

810 ILCS 5/2-508 (2026)

Cure by seller of improper tender or delivery; replacement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(810 ILCS 5/2-508) (from Ch. 26, par. 2-508)
    Sec. 2-508. Cure by seller of improper tender or delivery; replacement.
    (1) Where any tender or delivery by the seller is rejected because non-conforming and the time for performance has not yet expired, the seller may seasonably notify the buyer of his intention to cure and may then within the contract time make a conforming delivery.
    (2) Where the buyer rejects a non-conforming tender which the seller had reasonable grounds to believe would be acceptable with or without money allowance the seller may if he seasonably notifies the buyer have a further reasonable time to substitute a conforming tender.
(Source: Laws 1961, p. 2101.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2001–2020 · leading case: Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc., 2019 IL 124285 (Ill. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc., 2019 IL 124285 (Ill. 2019). “” 810 ILCS 5/2-508 (West 2014). ¶ 24 We disagree.”
Vill. of Deerfield v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 929 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “810 ILCS 5/2-508 (West 2008) (seller of nonconforming shipment of commercial goods may cure by making a conforming shipment; statute contains no provision requiring buyer to accept tender of money representing diminution of value of goods).”
Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc., 2018 IL App (2d) 170972 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “(West 2016) ) do not define "reasonableness" for claims that do not involve the Act, (3) defendant failed to establish its satisfaction of section 2-508(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) ( 810 ILCS 5/2-508(2) (West 2016) ), (4) an opportunity to cure is not a prerequisite…”
Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc., 2019 IL 124285 (Ill. 2020). “” 810 ILCS 5/2-508 (West 2014). ¶ 24 We disagree.”
Magnum Press Automation, Inc. v. Thomas & Betts Corp. (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “" 810 ILCS 5/2-508(1) (West 2000). We cannot agree that section 2-508(1) operates to save this transaction.”
— 810 ILCS 5/2-508(1) — 1 case
Magnum Press Automation, Inc. v. Thomas & Betts Corp. (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “" 810 ILCS 5/2-508(1) (West 2000). We cannot agree that section 2-508(1) operates to save this transaction.”
— 810 ILCS 5/2-508(2) — 1 case
Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc., 2018 IL App (2d) 170972 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “(West 2016) ) do not define "reasonableness" for claims that do not involve the Act, (3) defendant failed to establish its satisfaction of section 2-508(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) ( 810 ILCS 5/2-508(2) (West 2016) ), (4) an opportunity to cure is not a prerequisite…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.