810 ILCS 5/4-402

Bank's liability to customer for wrongful dishonor; time of determining insufficiency of account

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(810 ILCS 5/4-402) (from Ch. 26, par. 4-402)
    Sec. 4-402. Bank's liability to customer for wrongful dishonor; time of determining insufficiency of account.
    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Article, a payor bank wrongfully dishonors an item if it dishonors an item that is properly payable, but a bank may dishonor an item that would create an overdraft unless it had agreed to pay the overdraft.
    (b) A payor bank is liable to its customer for damages proximately caused by the wrongful dishonor of an item. Liability is limited to actual damages proved and may include damages for an arrest or prosecution of the customer or other consequential damages. Whether any consequential damages are proximately caused by the wrongful dishonor is a question of fact to be determined in each case.
    (c) A payor bank's determination of the customer's account balance on which a decision to dishonor for insufficiency of available funds is based may be made at any time between the time the item is received by the payor bank and the time that the payor bank returns the item or gives notice in lieu of return, and no more than one determination need be made. If, at the election of the payor bank, a subsequent balance determination is made for the purpose of reevaluating the bank's decision to dishonor the item, the account balance at that time is determinative of whether a dishonor for insufficiency of available funds is wrongful.
(Source: P.A. 87-582; 87-1135.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2008 · leading case: Kronemeyer v. U.S. Bank National Assoc.
Kronemeyer v. U.S. Bank National Assoc. (2006) illappct · cites it 5× “For the reasons set forth below, we decline to reach the issue certified on appeal with regard to the plaintiffs' claim for wrongful dishonor under section 4-402 of the Uniform Commercial Code (810 ILCS 5/4-402 (West 2004)) because the plaintiffs lack standing to 1 bring that…”
Johnson v. First Banks, Inc. (2008) illappct · cites it 4× “On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the circuit court erred in finding that he lacked standing to bring suit for wrongful dishonor pursuant to section 4-402 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code) (810 ILCS 5/4-402 (West 2004)) and in finding that his state law causes of action…”
— 810 ILCS 5/4-402(b) — 2 cases
Kronemeyer v. U.S. Bank National Assoc. (2006) illappct “For the reasons set forth below, we decline to reach the issue certified on appeal with regard to the plaintiffs' claim for wrongful dishonor under section 4-402 of the Uniform Commercial Code (810 ILCS 5/4-402 (West 2004)) because the plaintiffs lack standing to 1 bring that…”
Johnson v. First Banks, Inc. (2008) illappct “On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the circuit court erred in finding that he lacked standing to bring suit for wrongful dishonor pursuant to section 4-402 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Code) (810 ILCS 5/4-402 (West 2004)) and in finding that his state law causes of action…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.