Illinois Compiled Statutes
815 ILCS 710/18 (2026)
Board; powers
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 710/18)
Sec. 18.
Board; powers.
The Board shall have the following powers:
(a) To conduct hearings, by or through its duly authorized
administrative hearing officer, on protests filed under Sections 4,
5, 6, 7, 9, 10.1, 11,
and 12
of this Act.
(b) To make reasonable regulations that are necessary to carry
out and effect its official duties and such further rules as necessary relating
to the time, place, and manner of conducting hearings as provided for in this
Act.
(c) To advise the Secretary of State upon appointments.
(d) To advise the Secretary of State on legislation proposed
to amend this Act or any related Act.
The changes to this Section made by this amendatory Act of the
92nd General Assembly (i) apply only to causes of action accruing on or
after its effective date and (ii) are intended to provide only an additional
venue for dispute resolution without changing any substantive rights under this
Act.
(Source: P.A. 92-272, eff. 1-1-02.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2006–2014 · leading case: Yakubinis v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA, 847 N.E.2d 552 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
Yakubinis v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA, 847 N.E.2d 552 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “” 815 ILCS 710/18(a) (West 2002). Because, as discussed above, section 4(e)(8) may not be applied retroactively to Yakubinis’s 1989 franchise agreement, Yakubinis failed to state a cause of action under that section.”
Nissan North Am., Inc. v. The Motor Veh. Review Bd., 2014 IL App (1st) 123795 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “See 815 ILCS 710/18 (West 2012) (Board is tasked with administering the Act); see also General Motors Corp.”
Yakubinis v. Yamaha Motors Corp, U.S.A (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “@ 815 ILCS 710/18(a) (West 2002). Because, as discussed above, section 4(e)(8) may not be applied retroactively to Yakubinis=s 1989 franchise agreement, Yakubinis failed to state a cause of action under that section.”
— 815 ILCS 710/18(a) — 2 cases
Yakubinis v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA, 847 N.E.2d 552 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “” 815 ILCS 710/18(a) (West 2002). Because, as discussed above, section 4(e)(8) may not be applied retroactively to Yakubinis’s 1989 franchise agreement, Yakubinis failed to state a cause of action under that section.”
Yakubinis v. Yamaha Motors Corp, U.S.A (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “@ 815 ILCS 710/18(a) (West 2002). Because, as discussed above, section 4(e)(8) may not be applied retroactively to Yakubinis=s 1989 franchise agreement, Yakubinis failed to state a cause of action under that section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|