Sec. 3. (a) This section applies to the board of trustees
of the following state educational institutions:
(1) Ball State University.
(2) Indiana University.
(3) Indiana State University.
(4) Purdue University.
(5) University of Southern Indiana.
(b) The board of trustees of a state educational institution may
govern, by lawful means, the conduct of the state educational
institution's students, faculty, and employees, wherever the conduct
might occur, to prevent unlawful or objectionable acts that:
(1) seriously threaten the ability of the state educational
institution to maintain the state educational institution's facilities;
or
(2) violate the reasonable rules and standards of the state
educational institution designed to protect the academic
community from unlawful conduct or conduct presenting a
serious threat to person or property of the academic community.
[Pre-2007 Higher Education Recodification Citation:
20-12-1-2(a)(3).]
As added by P.L.2-2007, SEC.280.
Notes of Decisions
Zimmerman v. Bd. of Trs. of Ball State Univ., 940 F. Supp. 2d 875 (S.D. Ind. 2013).
· cites it 42× “They also assert that Ball State’s actions in disciplining them for the sandwich prank and the events leading up to and culminating in the YouTube posting fall outside of the grant of authority to state-funded educational institutions provided by the Indiana General Assembly in…”
Doe v. Univ. of S. Indiana (S.D. Ind. 2022).
· cites it 2× “(citing Ind. Code § 21-39-2-3 ). This statutory authority authorizes USI "to construct [its] own disciplinary procedures," and as a USI student, John contractually agreed to USI's procedures for deciding Jane's allegation, including USI's appeal process.”
— Ind. Code § 21-39-2-3(2) — 1 case
Zimmerman v. Bd. of Trs. of Ball State Univ., 940 F. Supp. 2d 875 (S.D. Ind. 2013).
“They also assert that Ball State’s actions in disciplining them for the sandwich prank and the events leading up to and culminating in the YouTube posting fall outside of the grant of authority to state-funded educational institutions provided by the Indiana General Assembly in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.