Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 25-40-2-2 (2026)

Privileged information disclosed to employee assistance professional

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 2. Matters communicated by a client to an employee assistance professional in the employee assistance professional's official capacity are privileged information and may not be disclosed by the employee assistance professional to any person, except under the following circumstances:

(1) In a criminal proceeding involving a homicide if the disclosure relates directly to the fact or immediate circumstances of the homicide.

(2) When the communication reveals the contemplation or commission of a crime or a serious harmful act.

(3) When:

(A) the client is an unemancipated minor or an adult adjudicated to be incompetent; and

(B) the information communicated to the employee assistance professional indicates the client was the victim of abuse or a crime.

(4) In a proceeding to determine mental competency or a proceeding in which a defense of mental incompetency is raised.

(5) In a civil or criminal malpractice action against the employee assistance professional.

(6) When the employee assistance professional has the express consent of:

(A) the client; or

(B) the client's legal representative in the case of a client's death or disability.

(7) To a physician when the physician is licensed under IC 25-22.5 and has established a physician-patient relationship with the client.

(8) When privileged communication is abrogated under Indiana law.

As added by P.L.185-1999, SEC.1.

 

IC 25-41ARTICLE 41. REPEALED

Repealed by P.L.212-2021, SEC.13.

 

IC 25-42ARTICLE 42. INTERSTATE NURSE LICENSURE COMPACT

 

           Ch. 1.Definitions
           Ch. 2.Findings and Purpose
           Ch. 3.General Provisions and Jurisdiction
           Ch. 4.Application for Nurse Licensure in a Party State
           Ch. 5.Additional Authorities Invested in Party State Licensing Boards
           Ch. 6.Coordinated Licensure Information System and Exchange of Information
           Ch. 7.Establishment of the Interstate Commission of Nurse Licensure Compact Administrators
           Ch. 8.Rulemaking
           Ch. 9.Oversight, Dispute Resolution, and Enforcement
           Ch. 10.Withdrawal and Amendment
           Ch. 11.Construction and Severability

 

IC 25-42-1Chapter 1. Definitions

 

           25-42-1-1Application of definitions
           25-42-1-2"Adverse action"
           25-42-1-3"Alternative program"
           25-42-1-4"Commission"
           25-42-1-5"Coordinated licensure information system"
           25-42-1-6"Current significant investigative information"
           25-42-1-7"Encumbrance"
           25-42-1-8"Home state"
           25-42-1-9"Licensed nurse"
           25-42-1-10"Licensing board"
           25-42-1-11"Multistate license"
           25-42-1-12"Multistate licensure privilege"
           25-42-1-13"NCLEX"
           25-42-1-14"Nurse license"
           25-42-1-15"Party state"
           25-42-1-16"Remote state"
           25-42-1-17"Single state license"
           25-42-1-18"State"
           25-42-1-19"State board of nursing"
           25-42-1-20"State practice laws"

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: Oksana Oleszko v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, David Howard, & Dora Cooke, 243 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2001).
Oksana Oleszko v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, David Howard, & Dora Cooke, 243 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2001). “§ 52-146n (West 2000) (recognizing a privilege for communications between state judicial department employees and EAP counselors); Ind.Code Ann. § 25-40-2-2 (West 2001) (recognizing a privilege for communications between a client and an employee assistance professional); N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.