Sec. 1. (a) The estate of a person dying intestate shall
descend and be distributed as provided in this section.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c), the surviving
spouse shall receive the following share:
(1) One-half (1/2) of the net estate if the intestate is survived by
at least one (1) child or by the issue of at least one (1) deceased
child.
(2) Three-fourths (3/4) of the net estate, if there is no surviving
issue, but the intestate is survived by one (1) or both of the
intestate's parents.
(3) All of the net estate, if there is no surviving issue or parent.
(c) If the surviving spouse is a second or other subsequent spouse
who did not at any time have children by the decedent, and the
decedent left surviving the decedent a child or children or the
descendants of a child or children by a previous spouse, the surviving
second or subsequent childless spouse shall take only an amount equal
to twenty-five percent (25%) of the remainder of:
(1) the fair market value as of the date of death of the real
property of the deceased spouse; minus
(2) the value of the liens and encumbrances on the real property
of the deceased spouse.
The fee shall, at the decedent's death, vest at once in the decedent's
surviving child or children, or the descendants of the decedent's child
or children who may be dead. A second or subsequent childless spouse
described in this subsection shall, however, receive the same share of
the personal property of the decedent as is provided in subsection (b)
with respect to surviving spouses generally.
(d) The share of the net estate not distributable to the surviving
spouse, or the entire net estate if there is no surviving spouse, shall
descend and be distributed as follows:
(1) To the issue of the intestate, if they are all of the same degree
of kinship to the intestate, they shall take equally, or if of unequal
degree, then those of more remote degrees shall take by
representation.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (e), if there is a surviving
spouse but no surviving issue of the intestate, then to the
surviving parents of the intestate.
(3) Except as provided in subsection (e), if there is no surviving
spouse or issue of the intestate, then to the surviving parents,
brothers, and sisters, and the issue of deceased brothers and
sisters of the intestate. Each living parent of the intestate shall be
treated as of the same degree as a brother or sister and shall be
entitled to the same share as a brother or sister. However, the
share of each parent shall be not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the
decedent's net estate. Issue of deceased brothers and sisters shall
take by representation.
(4) If there is no surviving parent or brother or sister of the
intestate, then to the issue of brothers and sisters. If the
distributees described in this subdivision are all in the same
degree of kinship to the intestate, they shall take equally or, if of
unequal degree, then those of more remote degrees shall take by
representation.
(5) If there is no surviving issue or parent of the intestate or issue
of a parent, then to the surviving grandparents of the intestate
equally.
(6) If there is no surviving issue or parent or issue of a parent, or
grandparent of the intestate, then the estate of the decedent shall
be divided into that number of shares equal to the sum of:
(A) the number of brothers and sisters of the decedent's parents
surviving the decedent; plus
(B) the number of deceased brothers and sisters of the
decedent's parents leaving issue surviving both them and the
decedent;
and one (1) of the shares shall pass to each of the brothers and
sisters of the decedent's parents or their respective issue per
stirpes.
(7) If interests in real estate go to a husband and wife under this
subsection, the aggregate interests so descending shall be owned
by them as tenants by the entireties. Interests in personal property
so descending shall be owned as tenants in common.
(8) If there is no person mentioned in subdivisions (1) through
(7), then to the state.
(e) A parent may not receive an intestate share of the estate of the
parent's minor or adult child if the parent was convicted of causing the
death of the child's other parent by:
(1) murder (IC 35-42-1-1);
(2) voluntary manslaughter (IC 35-42-1-3); or
(3) another criminal act, if the death does not result from the
operation of a vehicle.
If a parent is disqualified from receiving an intestate share under this
subsection, the estate of the deceased child shall be distributed as
though the parent had predeceased the child.
Formerly: Acts 1953, c.112, s.201; Acts 1965, c.405, s.1. As
amended by P.L.283-1987, SEC.1; P.L.5-1988, SEC.154;
P.L.167-1988, SEC.1; P.L.176-2003, SEC.3; P.L.238-2005, SEC.3;
P.L.61-2006, SEC.1; P.L.101-2008, SEC.5; P.L.1-2009, SEC.151;
P.L.143-2009, SEC.8; P.L.142-2020, SEC.32.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
33
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case:
Inlow v. Inlow, 797 N.E.2d 810 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003).
Inlow v. Inlow, 797 N.E.2d 810 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 12× “I.C. § 29-1-2-1. Because the Estate remains open, there has been no final accounting to determine whether any of Inlow's heirs have received distributions in excess of their intestate share.”
Troxel v. Troxel, 737 N.E.2d 745 (Ind. 2000).
· cites it 4× “1(d), ownership of the twenty-four acre parcel passed to them via the Indiana intestacy statute, Indiana Code section 29-1-2-1. In other words, they argue that at the time of Jack’s death, or, alternatively, when the three-year statute of limitations expired, the title to the…”
Smith v. Toney, 862 N.E.2d 656 (Ind. 2007).
· cites it 4× “I.C. § 29-1-2-1. Cohabiting partners without subsequent marriage, regardless of whether they are engaged at the time, are not presumed to intend to share rights to property in the absence of an express contract or a viable equitable theory.”
Est. of Lamey v. Lamey, 689 N.E.2d 1265 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 4× “Indiana Code Section 29-1-2-1(d)(1) provides in pertinent part that when a person dies intestate and without a spouse, his net estate shall be distributed to "the issue of the intestate".”
Inlow v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 771 N.E.2d 1174 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 4× “Pursuant to Ind. Code § 29-1-2-1 , the second wife is entitled to one-half of the Estate, while the five children are entitled to share equally the other half of the Estate.”
Gabriel v. Gabriel, 947 N.E.2d 1001 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 2× “Ind.Code§ 29-1-2-1. 7 . As noted at the outset, it is unfortunate that the parties did not seek out the necessary professional advice and services in this instance.”
Regalado v. Est. of Regalado, 933 N.E.2d 512 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “2 Because Joseph left no surviving spouse or issue, according to Indiana Code section 29-1-2-1(d)(8) his estate is to be distributed to his surviving parents, brothers, sisters, and issue of his deceased brothers and sisters.”
Hacker v. Hacker, 659 N.E.2d 1104 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995).
“If one of John's parents precedes the other in death, the surviving spouse will inherit half of the decedent spouse's estate. If the surviving spouse remarries but does not have any more children, the subsequent spouse will take a life estate in % of the farm.”
Luider v. Skaggs, 693 N.E.2d 593 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998).
“Admittedly, under Indiana’s intestate succession statute, Ind.Code 29-1-2-1, the decedent’s brother would be next in the line of succession since decedent had no surviving spouse or issue.”
Keith v. Dooley, 802 N.E.2d 54 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 29-1-2-1(d)(4) ("The share of the net estate not distributable to the surviving spouse, or the entire net estate if there is no surviving spouse, shall descend and be distributed as follows: .”
— Ind. Code § 29-1-2-1(a) — 1 case
— Ind. Code § 29-1-2-1(c) — 1 case
Troxel v. Troxel, 737 N.E.2d 745 (Ind. 2000).
“1(d), ownership of the twenty-four acre parcel passed to them via the Indiana intestacy statute, Indiana Code section 29-1-2-1. In other words, they argue that at the time of Jack’s death, or, alternatively, when the three-year statute of limitations expired, the title to the…”
— Ind. Code § 29-1-2-1(d)(1) — 2 cases
Est. of Lamey v. Lamey, 689 N.E.2d 1265 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997).
“Indiana Code Section 29-1-2-1(d)(1) provides in pertinent part that when a person dies intestate and without a spouse, his net estate shall be distributed to "the issue of the intestate".”
Hacker v. Hacker, 659 N.E.2d 1104 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995).
“If one of John's parents precedes the other in death, the surviving spouse will inherit half of the decedent spouse's estate. If the surviving spouse remarries but does not have any more children, the subsequent spouse will take a life estate in % of the farm.”
— Ind. Code § 29-1-2-1(d)(3) — 3 cases
Est. of Lamey v. Lamey, 689 N.E.2d 1265 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997).
“Indiana Code Section 29-1-2-1(d)(1) provides in pertinent part that when a person dies intestate and without a spouse, his net estate shall be distributed to "the issue of the intestate".”
— Ind. Code § 29-1-2-1(d)(4) — 1 case
Keith v. Dooley, 802 N.E.2d 54 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
“See Ind.Code § 29-1-2-1(d)(4) ("The share of the net estate not distributable to the surviving spouse, or the entire net estate if there is no surviving spouse, shall descend and be distributed as follows: .”
— Ind. Code § 29-1-2-1(d)(8) — 2 cases
Regalado v. Est. of Regalado, 933 N.E.2d 512 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010).
“2 Because Joseph left no surviving spouse or issue, according to Indiana Code section 29-1-2-1(d)(8) his estate is to be distributed to his surviving parents, brothers, sisters, and issue of his deceased brothers and sisters.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.