Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 35-47-1-5 (2026)

"Firearm"

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 5. "Firearm" means any weapon:

(1) that is:

(A) capable of expelling; or

(B) designed to expel; or

(2) that may readily be converted to expel;

a projectile by means of an explosion.

As added by P.L.311-1983, SEC.32. Amended by P.L.3-2008, SEC.254.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2024 · leading case: Staten v. State, 844 N.E.2d 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).
Staten v. State, 844 N.E.2d 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “Specifically, she asserts that a disassembled handgun does not meet the definition of "firearm" under Indiana Code Section 35-47-1-5 and, therefore, that she was not carrying a handgun in violation of Indiana Code Section 35-47-2-1.”
State v. Gibbs, 769 N.E.2d 594 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 5× “Therefore, regardless of the handgun's age,, if it was "designed to expel a projectile by means of an explosion," see I.C. § 35-47-1-5, and meets the handling and barrel-length requirements of LC.”
Miller v. State, 616 N.E.2d 750 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 6× “" Ind. Code § 35-47-1-5 . The evidence in this case demonstrates Miller's pellet gun is a handgun as defined by statute.”
Christopher Smith v. State of Indiana, 8 N.E.3d 668 (Ind. 2014). · cites it 4× “So would Smith have us excuse from criminal culpability the serious violent felon who possesses a shotgun, truthfully not knowing that it meets the definition of a firearm? See Ind. Code §§ 35-47-1-5 , -4-5 (2008). Do we forgive the individual who, after his driver’s license is…”
Alexander v. State, 768 N.E.2d 971 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “" Ind.Code § 35-47-1-5 (Burns Code Ed. Repl.”
Lewis v. State, 769 N.E.2d 243 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “" Ind.Code § 35-47-1-5. A "handgun" is "any firearm designed or adapted so as to be aimed 'and fired from one (1) hand, regardless of barrel length; or any firearm with a barrel less than sixteen (16) inches in length; or an overall length of less than twenty-six (26) inches.”
Hatchett v. State, 740 N.E.2d 920 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). “Cope § 35-47-1-5 (defining "firearm" as "any weapon that is capable of or designed to or that may readily be converted to expel a projectile by means of an explosion") (emphasis added); Inp.”
N.W.W. v. State, 878 N.E.2d 506 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “”); Ind.Code § 35-47-1-5 (defining “firearm” as “any weapon that is capable of or designed to or that may readily be converted to expel a projectile by means of an explosion.”
State v. Enriquez, 2024 ND 164 (N.D. 2024). “1 (2023); Ind. Code § 35-47-1-5 (2008); Iowa Code § 683.”
State v. Craddick, 311 P.3d 1157 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013). “Code § 35-47-1-5 “because carbon dioxide (C02), the propellant in this case[,] is a non combustible gas and, thus, cannot explode”; rather, “[t]he expansion of compressed gas that propels the pellet is a physical force, like tire force from a compressed spring in a BB gun.”
Jacob Hart v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 4× “” I.C. § 35-47-1-5. Not challenging his status as a serious violent felon, Hart instead contends that law enforcement testimony was “far from unequivocal” that he possessed a firearm as statutorily defined.”
Kevin Perry v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “Ind. Code § 35-47-1-5 . Perry contends the State only presented evidence “that he held a weapon that had the appearance of a gun” and “the State did not present proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the object Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.