Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 4-13-2-14 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Formerly: Acts 1947, c.279, s.14. As amended by Acts 1979, P.L.23, SEC.1; P.L.14-1984, SEC.5. Repealed by P.L.31-1987, SEC.21.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2023 · leading case: Citizens Energy Coalition of Indiana, D/B/A Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana v. Theodore L. Sendak, Attorney Gen. of Indiana, 594 F.2d 1158 (7th Cir. 1979).
Citizens Energy Coalition of Indiana, D/B/A Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana v. Theodore L. Sendak, Attorney Gen. of Indiana, 594 F.2d 1158 (7th Cir. 1979). “Ind.Code 4-13-2-14. 3 On March 29, 1978, the Indiana Attorney General disapproved the proposed contract in part because the Coalition maintained a registered lobbyist and "a conflict may arise under the terms of IC 2-4-3 Et seq.”
Mother Goose Nursery Schs., Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668 (7th Cir. 1985). “He claims first that he is entitled to absolute immunity from liability under Section 1983 because his actions under Ind. Code 4-13-2-14 rejecting Mother Goose’s proposed contract are quasi-judicial in nature, Citizens Energy Coalition v.”
Mother Goose Nursery Schs., Inc. v. Sendak, 770 F.2d 668 (7th Cir. 1985). “He claims first that he is entitled to absolute immunity from liability under Section 1983 because his actions under Ind.Code 4-13-2-14 rejecting Mother Goose's proposed contract are quasi-judicial in nature, Citizens Energy Coalition v.”
Mother Goose Nursery Schs., Inc. v. Sendak, 502 F. Supp. 1319 (N.D. Ind. 1980). “All contracts entered into by state agencies such as the Indiana Department of Public Welfare must be approved by the attorney general pursuant to Ind. Code 4-13-2-14 which reads, “All contracts and leases shall be approved as to form and legality by the attorney-general.”
Citizens Energy Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Sendak, 459 F. Supp. 248 (S.D. Ind. 1978). “Ind.Code 4-13-2-14 provides that all contracts entered into by state agencies shall be approved as to form and legality by the Attorney General.”
Mother Goose Nursery Schs., Inc. v. Sendak, 591 F. Supp. 897 (N.D. Ind. 1984). “” Ind.Code § 4-13-2-14. 4 Defendant did not take any action on this matter until September 26, 1978 when he wrote a letter to the Governor of Indiana stating that he refused to approve the subject contract because Mr.”
Trust & Inv. Advisors, Inc. v. Hogsett, 830 F. Supp. 463 (S.D. Ind. 1993). “2d at 671 (Indiana Attorney General entitled to quasi-judicial immunity when reviewing contracts pursuant to Ind.Code § 4-13-2-14); see Reed v. Village of Shorewood, 704 F.”
Small Bus. in Transp. Coalition v. Indiana Dep't of Revenue (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “at 41 (citing Ind. Code § 4-13-2-14 .1). [31] Although we find many of Plaintiffs arguments empty, we need not delve into the task of untangling and addressing each of them.”
James Holden v. Ice Miller LLC (Ind. Ct. App. 2023). “Relator, “[t]hese documents showed that during Defendant Mitchell’s time in office, the [Treasurer] has approved numerous contracts worth millions of dollars, mostly to Defendant Mitchell’s campaign donors and supporters, without obtaining the approval of the State Budget…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.