Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 6-4.1-9-2 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As added by Acts 1976, P.L.18, SEC.1. Amended by P.L.252-2001, SEC.7. Repealed by P.L.79-2017, SEC.41.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1998–2015 · leading case: Dep't of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Div. v. Est. of Phelps, 697 N.E.2d 506 (Ind. T.C. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dep't of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Div. v. Est. of Phelps, 697 N.E.2d 506 (Ind. T.C. 1998). · cites it 2× “CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the probate court is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the probate court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the Department and against the Estate.”

Indiana Dep't of State Revenue v. Est. of Ogle, 923 N.E.2d 493 (Ind. T.C. 2010). · cites it 4× “Indeed, Indiana Code § 6-4.1-9-2 provides that [{f the inheritance tax imposed .”

Indiana Dep't of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Div. v. Est. of Schoenenberger, 976 N.E.2d 148 (Ind. T.C. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 6-4.1-9-2 (2003); 45 Ind. Admin.”

Indiana Dep't of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Div. v. James F. Keenan & Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Co-Pers. Representatives of the Est. of Judd Leighton (Ind. T.C. 2015). “CODE § 6-4.1-9-2 (2005); 45 IND. ADMIN. CODE 4.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.