Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 8-1-8-1 (2026)

Limitations on power

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 1. (a) A public utility, except in cities of the third class, engaged in the production, transmission, delivery, or furnishing of heat, light, water, or power or for the collection, treatment, purification, and disposal in a sanitary manner of liquid and solid sewage or furnishing facilities for transmission of intelligence by electricity to towns and cities and to the public in general or for the furnishing of elevator or warehouse service, either directly or indirectly, to or for the public, for the purpose of enabling it to perform its functions, may appropriate and condemn lands of individuals and private corporations, or any easement in any lands, necessary to the carrying out of its objects, whether the same be for its building, structures, dams, line of poles, wires, mains, conduits, and pipelines, or right-of-way to accommodate railway siding or switch tracks connecting its plant or plants with the tracks of any common carrier, overflowage by backwater from its dams, waste, or sluiceways.

     (b) However, within the limits of any incorporated town or city, the authority to appropriate does not:

(1) extend to lands situated in any city block in which more than fifty percent (50%) of the frontage is devoted to residence purposes;

(2) extend to common carriers engaged in the transportation of freight or passengers; or

(3) give to any public utility any right or authority to:

(A) appropriate any land or easement within the corporate limits of any city for overflowage by backwater from any dam;

(B) appropriate or acquire any dam, race, or sluiceway existing on May 31, 1921, or any interest in either, except to use water for condensation purposes;

(C) appropriate or acquire any pipeline laid or contained within the limits of private property; or

(D) authorize any corporation developing hydroelectric power to unreasonably interfere with or disturb the natural flow of the stream from which power may be derived. Lands or easements in lands acquired by appropriation and condemnation shall be held and enjoyed by the company for those purposes as though the land or easement had been acquired by purchase.

     (c) If a not-for-profit sewer utility (as described in IC 8-1-2-125(a)) appropriates or condemns land to acquire an easement or right-of-way necessary to carry out the not-for-profit sewer utility's objectives, the easement or right-of-way may not exceed fifty (50) feet in width.

     (d) The appropriation and condemnation of lands and easements in lands authorized by this section must be done under the terms and conditions and in the manner prescribed by IC 32-24-1.

Formerly: Acts 1921, c.98, s.1; Acts 1961, c.195, s.1. As amended by P.L.59-1984, SEC.59; P.L.2-2002, SEC.36; P.L.97-2012, SEC.2.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Wagler v. West Boggs Sewer Dist., Inc., 898 N.E.2d 815 (Ind. 2008).
Wagler v. West Boggs Sewer Dist., Inc., 898 N.E.2d 815 (Ind. 2008). · cites it 4× “Indiana Code § 8-1-8-1 grants condemnation and appropriation authority to public utilities and explicitly includes entities engaged in the collection, treatment, purification, and disposal of liquid and solid wastes.”
South E. Indiana Nat. Gas Co. v. Ingram, 617 N.E.2d 943 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Judicial review of that determination may be obtained as provided in Indiana Code § 8-1-8-1. Id. The Ingrams cannot divest the IURC of its statutory jurisdiction and the intended procedure for obtaining relief merely by claiming money damages.”
Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. N. Indiana Pub. Serv. Co., 804 N.E.2d 289 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “CAC maintains that because it had the statutory authority to appeal pursuant to this section, it was permitted to raise issues not raised below because it was not a party to those proceedings.”
Knox Cnty. Rural Elec. Membership Corp. v. PSI Energy, Inc., 663 N.E.2d 182 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “LIC. § 8-1-8-1. In reviewing the Commission's order, we employ a two-tier standard of review.”
Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen Cnty., 125 F. Supp. 2d 338 (N.D. Ind. 2000). · cites it 8× “The legislature has concluded that a public utility may condemn land for its “building, structures, dams, line of poles, wires, mains, conduits, pipelines, or right of way to accommodate railway siding or switch tracks .”
Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. PSI Energy, Inc., 664 N.E.2d 401 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). “§ 8-1-8-1 (West Supp.1995). In pertinent part, this section states that: An assignment of errors that the decision, ruling or order of the commission is contrary to law shall be sufficient to present both the sufficiency of the facts found to sustain the decision, ruling, or…”
Panhandle E. Pipe Line Co. v. Madison Cnty. Drainage Bd., 898 F. Supp. 1302 (S.D. Ind. 1995). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 8-1-8-1 (allowing “[a]ny public utility” engaged in “the production, transmission, delivery or furnishing of heat, light, water or power .”
Gen. Motors Corp. v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co., 654 N.E.2d 752 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995). “" Our standard of review of Commission orders was stated recently as follows: "Ind.Code 8-1-8-1 provides statutory authority for this court to review Commission orders, stating, in pertinent part: An assignment of errors that the decision, ruling or order of the commission is…”
Wymberley Sanitary Works v. Batliner, 904 N.E.2d 326 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “II Eminent Domain It is undisputed that Wymberley is a public utility that has the right to exercise the power of eminent domain pursuant to Indiana Code section 8-1-8-1. To exercise this power, the condemning authority must establish, among other things, that it made the…”
Calumet Nat'l Bank v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 647 N.E.2d 689 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995). “CODE § 8-1-8-1 (1998). As discussed below, the Utilities followed the steps required by IC 32-11-1-1 and IC 32-11-1-2 before filing their complaint to condemn this permanent easement.”
Bradley SurVance v. Duke Energy Indiana, LLC (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 6× “2009) (citing Ind. Code § 8-1-8-1 ), trans. denied. 2 Condemnation proceedings involve two stages: an initial or summary phase, in which a complaint is filed and the landowner files objections thereto, and a second phase in which the landowner’s damages are determined.”
Metro. Sch. Dist. of Sw. Allen Cnty., Indiana v. Crown Enter. (Ind. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 3× “§ 8-1-8-1(a) (emphasis added). Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-PL-290 | December 31, 2025 Page 8 of 29 are distinguishable because they did not deal with a challenge to the applicability of the present need requirement; rather, the parties disputed whether the…”
— Ind. Code § 8-1-8-1(a) — 2 cases
Metro. Sch. Dist. of Sw. Allen Cnty., Indiana v. Crown Enter. (Ind. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 8-1-8-1(a) (emphasis added). Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-PL-290 | December 31, 2025 Page 8 of 29 are distinguishable because they did not deal with a challenge to the applicability of the present need requirement; rather, the parties disputed whether the…”
Bradley SurVance v. Duke Energy Indiana, LLC (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “2009) (citing Ind. Code § 8-1-8-1 ), trans. denied. 2 Condemnation proceedings involve two stages: an initial or summary phase, in which a complaint is filed and the landowner files objections thereto, and a second phase in which the landowner’s damages are determined.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.