Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Pre-1991 Recodification Citation: 9-1-3.6-4(a).]

As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.10. Amended by P.L.268-2003, SEC.24; P.L.110-2006, SEC.2; P.L.125-2012, SEC.132. Repealed by P.L.198-2016, SEC.395.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1996–2010 · leading case: Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 926 N.E.2d 487 (Ind. 2010).
Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 926 N.E.2d 487 (Ind. 2010). · cites it 10× “While acknowledging that Indiana Code § 9-22-3-11 is not free from ambiguity, we find persuasive the legislature's use of "acquiring" rather than "owning," the thirty-one day grace period within which to apply for a certificate of salvage title after receiving the original…”
Larry Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 589 F.3d 873 (7th Cir. 2009). · cites it 16× “There are a number of reasonable arguments that the obligations imposed by Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11 (e) are limited to current owners.”
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Larkin's Body Shop & Auto Care, Inc., 673 N.E.2d 846 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 5× “For example subsection (b) of I.C. § 9-22-3-11 requires an insurance company or other person to apply for a certificate of salvage title within thirty-one days after receipt of a certificate of title.”
Larry Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC (7th Cir. 2009). · cites it 22× “The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Randy’s, finding that Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11 (e) does not require an entity that acquired a wrecked vehicle to apply for a salvage title when it no longer owns the vehicle upon the receipt of the certificate of title.”
Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 589 F.3d 873 (7th Cir. 2010). · cites it 5× “Storie’s complaint alleges a violation of Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11 (d) (2004), which is also cited by the district court.”
— Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11(a) — 1 case
Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 926 N.E.2d 487 (Ind. 2010). “While acknowledging that Indiana Code § 9-22-3-11 is not free from ambiguity, we find persuasive the legislature's use of "acquiring" rather than "owning," the thirty-one day grace period within which to apply for a certificate of salvage title after receiving the original…”
— Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11(e) — 3 cases
Larry Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 589 F.3d 873 (7th Cir. 2009). “There are a number of reasonable arguments that the obligations imposed by Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11 (e) are limited to current owners.”
Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 926 N.E.2d 487 (Ind. 2010). “While acknowledging that Indiana Code § 9-22-3-11 is not free from ambiguity, we find persuasive the legislature's use of "acquiring" rather than "owning," the thirty-one day grace period within which to apply for a certificate of salvage title after receiving the original…”
Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, LLC, 589 F.3d 873 (7th Cir. 2010). “Storie’s complaint alleges a violation of Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11 (d) (2004), which is also cited by the district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.