1. A subject of a child abuse report, as identified in section 235A.15, subsection 2,
paragraph “a”, shall have the right to examine report data and disposition data which refers
to the subject. The department may prescribe reasonable hours and places of examination.
A subject of a child abuse report may provide additional information to the department that
is relevant to the report data and disposition data and may request that the department
revise the report data and disposition data.
2. At the time the notice of the results of a child abuse assessment performed in
accordance with section 232.71B is issued, the department shall provide notice to a person
named in the report as having abused a child of the right to a contested case hearing and
shall provide notice to subjects other than the person named in the report as having abused
a child of the right to intervene in a contested case proceeding, as provided in subsection 3.
3. a. A subject of a child abuse report may file with the department within ninety days
of the date of the notice of the results of a child abuse assessment performed in accordance
with section 232.71B, a written statement to the effect that report data and disposition data
referring to the subject is in whole or in part erroneous, and may request a correction of that
data or of the findings of the child abuse assessment report.
b. The department shall provide a person named in a child abuse report as having abused a
child, who has been adversely affected by a founded child abuse disposition, notwithstanding
the placement of the report data in the central registry pursuant to section 232.71D, with an
opportunity for a contested case hearing pursuant to chapter 17A to correct the data or the
findings, unless the department corrects the data or findings as requested.
c. The department shall provide a subject of a child abuse report, other than the person
named in the report as having abused a child, with an opportunity to file a motion to intervene
in the contested case proceeding.
d. The department may defer the hearing until the conclusion of the adjudicatory phase of
a pending juvenile or district court case relating to the data or findings. Upon request of any
party to the contested case proceeding, the presiding officer may stay the hearing until the
conclusion of the adjudicatory phase of a pending juvenile or district court case relating to
the data or findings. An adjudication of a child in need of assistance or a criminal conviction
in a district court case relating to the child abuse data or findings may be determinative in a
contested case proceeding.
e. A party to a contested case proceeding shall file an appeal of the presiding officer’s
proposed decision to the director within ten days of the presiding officer’s proposed decision.
If an appeal is not filed within ten days from the date of a proposed decision, the proposed
decision shall be the final agency action. If a party files an appeal within ten days from the
date of the proposed decision, the director has forty-five days from the date of the proposed
decision to issue a ruling. Upon the director’s failure to issue a ruling within forty-five days
of the date of the proposed decision, the proposed decision shall be the final agency action.
f. The department shall not disclose any report data or disposition data until the
conclusion of the proceeding to correct the data or findings, except as follows:
(1) As necessary for the proceeding itself.
(2) To the parties and attorneys involved in a judicial proceeding.
(3) For the regulation of child care or child placement.
(4) Pursuant to court order.
(5) To the subject of an assessment or a report.
(6) For the care or treatment of a child named in a report as a victim of abuse.
(7) To persons involved in an assessment of child abuse.
(8) For statutorily authorized record checks for employment of an individual by a provider
of adult home care, adult health facility care, or other adult placement facility care.
(9) For others identified in section 235A.15, subsection 2, paragraph “d”, subparagraph
(7), and section 235A.15, subsection 2, paragraph “e”, subparagraphs (9) and (16).
4. A person named in a child abuse report as having abused a child, who has been
adversely affected by a founded child abuse disposition, notwithstanding the placement of
the report data in the central registry pursuant to section 232.71D, may appeal the decision
resulting from a hearing held pursuant to subsection 3 to the district court of Polk county or
\n
Tue Dec 09 22:20:52 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 235A (42, 1)
13 CHILD ABUSE, §235A.21\n\nto the district court of the district in which the person named in the report as having abused
a child resides. Immediately upon appeal the court shall order the department to file with
the court a certified copy of the report data or disposition data. Appeal shall be taken in
accordance with chapter 17A.
5. Upon the request of the appellant, the record and evidence in such cases shall be closed
to all but the court and its officers, and access to the record and evidence shall be prohibited
unless otherwise ordered by the court. The clerk shall maintain a separate docket for such
actions. A person other than the appellant shall not permit a copy of any of the testimony or
pleadings or the substance of the testimony or pleadings to be made available to any person
other than a party to the action or the party’s attorney. Violation of the provisions of this
subsection shall be a public offense punishable under section 235A.21.
6. Whenever the department corrects or eliminates data as requested or as ordered by the
court, the department shall advise all persons who have received the incorrect data of such
fact. Upon application to the court and service of notice on the department, any subject of a
child abuse report may request and obtain a list of all persons who have received report data
or disposition data referring to the subject.
7. In the course of any proceeding provided for by this section, the identity of the person
who reported the disputed data and the identity of any person who has been reported
as having abused a child may be withheld upon a determination by the department that
disclosure of their identities would be detrimental to their interests.
[C75, 77, 79, 81, §235A.19]
85 Acts, ch 173, §18; 89 Acts, ch 230, §21; 92 Acts, ch 1143, §5; 94 Acts, ch 1130, §10; 95
Acts, ch 49, §3; 97 Acts, ch 35, §21, 25; 97 Acts, ch 176, §12, 39, 40, 43; 98 Acts, ch 1100, §98;
2000 Acts, ch 1067, §2; 2005 Acts, ch 121, §9; 2011 Acts, ch 28, §6; 2012 Acts, ch 1082, §3 – 5;
2013 Acts, ch 115, §14, 15, 19
Referred to in §216A.136, 232.71B, 232.71D, 235A.12, 235A.15
\n
Notes of Decisions
Reynolds v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 493 N.W.2d 813 (Iowa 1992).
· cites it 72× “70 (4)(b) and (c), DHS is obliged to notify the subject of the report and advise that person of the right to ask for a correction of the information in accordance with Iowa Code section 235A.19. Iowa Code § 232.71 (7). Just as the responsibility to investigate and compile child…”
Grant v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 722 N.W.2d 169 (Iowa 2006).
· cites it 6× “§ 235A.19. If a timely request is filed, [t]he department shall provide the subject with an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing pursuant to chapter 17A to correct the data or the findings, unless the department corrects the data or findings as requested.”
In the Interest of A.J., 821 N.W.2d 280 (Iowa Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 20× “” The State reasons that section 235A.19 provides a “clear path” for challenging assessments through the administrative process, while section 235A.”
Tiano v. Palmer, 621 N.W.2d 420 (Iowa 2001).
· cites it 6× “Iowa Code § 235A.19 (1991). The court of appeals concluded that “a person” as used in the statute refers only to the person accused of child abuse and that only the alleged abuser may request a correction of the abuse report or participate in an evi-dentiary hearing.”
Mauk v. State Dep't of Human Servs., 617 N.W.2d 909 (Iowa 2000).
· cites it 10× “Additionally, the DHS must “notify a subject of the report of the result of the investigation, of the subject’s right to correct the information pursuant to section 235A.19, and of the procedures to correct the information.”
Kruse v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 500 N.W.2d 455 (Iowa Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 52× “Iowa Code § 235A.19 (1991). It is worthy of note at this juncture that although there are a number of others who have access to the child abuse information (see section 235A.”
Montgomery v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 409 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 14× “18(3) provides that “if a correction of child abuse information is requested under section 235A.19 and the issue is not resolved at the end of the one-year .”
Michael Taylor v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 870 N.W.2d 262 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “STANDARD AND SCOPE OF REVIEW. We apply the standards of judicial review set forth in the Iowa Administrative Procedure Act, Iowa Code chapter 17A, in our review of the agency’s findings concerning child abuse reports.”
McCracken v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 595 N.W.2d 779 (Iowa 1999).
· cites it 2× “The department expunged the report pursuant to Iowa Code section 235A.19 (1995). In September 1995, Cynthia Hardy, another department investigator, was investigating an unrelated allegation of physical abuse by M.”
Billie Hovick v. Darci Patterson, 37 F.4th 511 (8th Cir. 2022).
“See Iowa Code § 235A.19(3), (4). “We turn next to whether [the Hovicks] ha[ve] successfully demonstrated a robust consensus of persuasive authority that created a clearly established right.”
Geringer v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 521 N.W.2d 730 (Iowa 1994).
· cites it 2× “Ellen initiated the present contested case proceeding pursuant to Iowa Code section 235A.19(2)(a) (1991) in an effort to require DHS to expunge the child abuse report from its central registry.”
Sean P. Huffman v. aIowa Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 8× “See Iowa Code § 235A.19 (2020). In the interim, the State charged Huffman by trial information with two counts of sexual abuse: sexual abuse in the second degree, in violation of Iowa 1 The Department was known as the Department of Human Services before merging with the…”
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(1) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(2) — 6 cases
Reynolds v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 493 N.W.2d 813 (Iowa 1992).
“70 (4)(b) and (c), DHS is obliged to notify the subject of the report and advise that person of the right to ask for a correction of the information in accordance with Iowa Code section 235A.19. Iowa Code § 232.71 (7). Just as the responsibility to investigate and compile child…”
Grant v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 722 N.W.2d 169 (Iowa 2006).
“§ 235A.19. If a timely request is filed, [t]he department shall provide the subject with an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing pursuant to chapter 17A to correct the data or the findings, unless the department corrects the data or findings as requested.”
Mauk v. State Dep't of Human Servs., 617 N.W.2d 909 (Iowa 2000).
“Additionally, the DHS must “notify a subject of the report of the result of the investigation, of the subject’s right to correct the information pursuant to section 235A.19, and of the procedures to correct the information.”
Montgomery v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 409 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa Ct. App. 1987).
“18(3) provides that “if a correction of child abuse information is requested under section 235A.19 and the issue is not resolved at the end of the one-year .”
In the Interest of A.J., 821 N.W.2d 280 (Iowa Ct. App. 2012).
“” The State reasons that section 235A.19 provides a “clear path” for challenging assessments through the administrative process, while section 235A.”
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(2)(a) — 5 cases
Reynolds v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 493 N.W.2d 813 (Iowa 1992).
“70 (4)(b) and (c), DHS is obliged to notify the subject of the report and advise that person of the right to ask for a correction of the information in accordance with Iowa Code section 235A.19. Iowa Code § 232.71 (7). Just as the responsibility to investigate and compile child…”
Grant v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 722 N.W.2d 169 (Iowa 2006).
“§ 235A.19. If a timely request is filed, [t]he department shall provide the subject with an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing pursuant to chapter 17A to correct the data or the findings, unless the department corrects the data or findings as requested.”
In the Interest of A.J., 821 N.W.2d 280 (Iowa Ct. App. 2012).
“” The State reasons that section 235A.19 provides a “clear path” for challenging assessments through the administrative process, while section 235A.”
Geringer v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 521 N.W.2d 730 (Iowa 1994).
“Ellen initiated the present contested case proceeding pursuant to Iowa Code section 235A.19(2)(a) (1991) in an effort to require DHS to expunge the child abuse report from its central registry.”
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(2)(b) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(3) — 3 cases
Mauk v. State Dep't of Human Servs., 617 N.W.2d 909 (Iowa 2000).
“Additionally, the DHS must “notify a subject of the report of the result of the investigation, of the subject’s right to correct the information pursuant to section 235A.19, and of the procedures to correct the information.”
Michael Taylor v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 870 N.W.2d 262 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015).
“STANDARD AND SCOPE OF REVIEW. We apply the standards of judicial review set forth in the Iowa Administrative Procedure Act, Iowa Code chapter 17A, in our review of the agency’s findings concerning child abuse reports.”
Billie Hovick v. Darci Patterson, 37 F.4th 511 (8th Cir. 2022).
“See Iowa Code § 235A.19(3), (4). “We turn next to whether [the Hovicks] ha[ve] successfully demonstrated a robust consensus of persuasive authority that created a clearly established right.”
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(3)(a) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(3)(b) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(3)(d) — 3 cases
Sean P. Huffman v. aIowa Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
“See Iowa Code § 235A.19 (2020). In the interim, the State charged Huffman by trial information with two counts of sexual abuse: sexual abuse in the second degree, in violation of Iowa 1 The Department was known as the Department of Human Services before merging with the…”
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(3)(e) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(3)(f) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(3)(f)(4) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 235A.19(6) — 1 case
Montgomery v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 409 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa Ct. App. 1987).
“18(3) provides that “if a correction of child abuse information is requested under section 235A.19 and the issue is not resolved at the end of the one-year .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.