Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 535.17 (2026)

Requirements of credit agreements — statute of frauds — modifications

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. A credit agreement is not enforceable in contract law by way of action or defense by any party unless a writing exists which contains all of the material terms of the agreement and is signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. 2. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, a modification of a credit agreement which occurs after the person asserting the modification has been notified in writing that oral or implied modifications to the credit agreement are unenforceable and should not be relied upon, is not enforceable in contract law by way of action or defense by any party unless a writing exists containing the material terms of the modification and is signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. This notification can be included among the terms of a credit agreement, can be included on a separate form or together with other disclosures that are provided when the agreement is made, or can be given wholly apart from the agreement and at any time after the agreement has been made. To be effective, the notification and its language must be conspicuous. A person who gives a notification is bound by it to the same extent as the person notified. A notification with respect to any credit agreement is effective with respect to all other credit agreements then in effect between the parties if the notification conspicuously so provides. When a modification is required by this section to be in writing and signed, such requirement cannot be modified except by clear and explicit language in a writing signed by the person against whom the modification is to be enforced. 3. A notification referred to in subsection 2 in the following form in boldface, ten point type, complies with the requirements of this section: IMPORTANT: READ BEFORE SIGNING. The terms of this agreement should be read carefully because only those terms in writing are enforceable. No other terms or oral promises not

\n

Tue Dec 09 22:03:08 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 535 (37, 0) 11 MONEY AND INTEREST, §535.18\n\n contained in this written contract may be legally enforced. You may change the terms of this agreement only by another written agreement. 4. Notwithstanding subsections 1 and 2, a credit agreement or modification of a credit agreement which is not in writing, but which is valid in other respects, is enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in court that the agreement or modification was made, but no agreement or modification is enforceable under this subsection beyond the terms admitted. 5. For purposes of this section, unless the context otherwise requires: a. “Action” includes petition, complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim, or any other pleading or proceeding to enforce affirmatively any right or duty or to recover damages for the nonperformance of any duty. b. “Contract” means a promise or set of promises for the breach of which the law would give a remedy or the performance of which the law would recognize a duty, and includes promissory obligations based on instruments and similar documents or on the contract doctrine of promissory estoppel. c. “Credit agreement” means any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract. “Credit agreement” does not mean a contract to loan money, finance a transaction, or otherwise extend credit by means of or pursuant to a credit card, as defined in section 537.1301, subsection 17, or pursuant to open-end credit, as defined in section 537.1301, subsection 32, or pursuant to a home equity line of credit, as defined in section 535.10 whether the loan, financing, or credit is for consumer or business purposes or a consumer rental purchase agreement as defined in section 537.3604, subsection 8. d. “Defense” includes setoff, recoupment, and any basis or means for barring or reducing liability or obligation on any claim. e. “Lender” means any person primarily in the business of loaning money, or financing sales, leases, or other provision of property or services. f. “Modification” includes change, addition, waiver, rescission, and any other variation of any kind whether expressly made or implied by, or inferred from, conduct of any kind. 6. This section shall be interpreted and applied purposively to ensure that contract actions and defenses on credit agreements are supported by clear and certain written proof of the terms of such agreements to protect against fraud and to enhance the clear and predictable understanding of rights and duties under credit agreements. 7. This section entirely displaces principles of common law and equity that would make or recognize exceptions to or otherwise limit or dilute the force and effect of its provisions concerning the enforcement in contract law of credit agreements or modifications of credit agreements. However, this section does not displace any additional or other requirements of contract law, which shall continue to apply, with respect to the making of enforceable contracts, including the requirement of consideration or other basis of validation. 8. This section does not apply to a credit agreement made primarily for a personal, family, or household purpose where the credit extended is twenty thousand dollars or less. 90 Acts, ch 1176, §1; 2017 Acts, ch 54, §76

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier, 580 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1998).
Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier, 580 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1998). · cites it 56× “Iowa Code § 535.17 (6). B. Having clarified what law governs, our next task is to apply it to the facts of this case.”
C & J Vantage Leasing Co., Assignor to Frontier Leasing Corp., Assignee v. Thomas Wolfe D/B/A Lake Macbride Golf Course & Thomas Wolfe, Individually, 795 N.W.2d 65 (Iowa 2011). · cites it 13× “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1). This section acts as a statute of frauds for credit agreements by ensuring that actions and defenses on credit agreements “are supported by clear and certain written proof of the terms of such agreements.”
Beal Bank v. Siems, 670 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2003). · cites it 21× “Iowa Code § 535.17 (2) (emphasis added). A “ ‘[c]redit agreement’ means any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
First Am. Bank v. Urbandale Laser Wash, LLC, Walnut Creek Laser Wash, LLC, & Steven Golden, 874 N.W.2d 650 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 535.17 (7) (“This section entirely displaces principles of common law and equity that would make or recognize exceptions to or other limit or dilute the force and effect of its provisions concerning the enforcement in contract law of credit agreements or…”
Sees v. Bank One, Indiana, N.A., 839 N.E.2d 154 (Ind. 2005). · cites it 2× “§ 656-1 (1990); Iowa Code § 535.17 (1990); Ky.Rev.Stat. § 371.”
Sanborn Sav. Bank v. Connie Freed, 38 F.4th 672 (8th Cir. 2022). · cites it 5× “Disclosure Required by Iowa Code § 535.17 (3) On appeal, Connie raises for the first time an argument that the Mortgage is not a credit agreement because it did not contain the disclosure required by § 535.”
Sarachek v. Luana Sav. Bank (In re Agriprocessors, Inc.), 490 B.R. 852 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2013). · cites it 4× “When it comes to overdraft agreements, the Iowa Supreme Court held that Iowa Code section 535.17 provides special “statute of frauds” requirements for credit agreements.”
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 66× “17(5)(c) defines a “credit agreement” as “any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa 2025). · cites it 66× “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1), (5)(c) (2018). The statutory prohibition against actions to enforce unwritten credit agreements and unwritten terms of credit agreements includes any action, petition, counterclaim, or crossclaim “to enforce affirmatively any right or duty or to recover…”
Pease v. Wachovia SBA Lending, Inc., 6 A.3d 867 (Md. 2010). “Code § 26-2-9-4 (2010) (Indiana); Iowa Code § 535.17 (2009); Kan. Stat. Arm.”
Jacqueline Geiger & Bruce Tracy v. Peoples Trust & Sav. Bank, Chris Goerdt & Country Bancorporation (Iowa Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 33× “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1) (emphasis added). The district court impliedly rejected this argument.”
Prof'l Solutions v. Seidman (Iowa 2021). · cites it 26× “The Gossett defendants raised fifteen additional affirmative defenses, including: (1) lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) violation of Iowa Code section 535.17, and (3) violation of Iowa’s usury statute contained in Iowa Code section 535.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(1) — 8 cases
C & J Vantage Leasing Co., Assignor to Frontier Leasing Corp., Assignee v. Thomas Wolfe D/B/A Lake Macbride Golf Course & Thomas Wolfe, Individually, 795 N.W.2d 65 (Iowa 2011). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1). This section acts as a statute of frauds for credit agreements by ensuring that actions and defenses on credit agreements “are supported by clear and certain written proof of the terms of such agreements.”
Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier, 580 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1998). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (6). B. Having clarified what law governs, our next task is to apply it to the facts of this case.”
Sarachek v. Luana Sav. Bank (In re Agriprocessors, Inc.), 490 B.R. 852 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2013). “When it comes to overdraft agreements, the Iowa Supreme Court held that Iowa Code section 535.17 provides special “statute of frauds” requirements for credit agreements.”
Prof'l Solutions v. Seidman (Iowa 2021). “The Gossett defendants raised fifteen additional affirmative defenses, including: (1) lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) violation of Iowa Code section 535.17, and (3) violation of Iowa’s usury statute contained in Iowa Code section 535.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(2) — 4 cases
Beal Bank v. Siems, 670 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2003). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (2) (emphasis added). A “ ‘[c]redit agreement’ means any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier, 580 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1998). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (6). B. Having clarified what law governs, our next task is to apply it to the facts of this case.”
First Am. Bank v. Urbandale Laser Wash, LLC, Walnut Creek Laser Wash, LLC, & Steven Golden, 874 N.W.2d 650 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015). “See Iowa Code § 535.17 (7) (“This section entirely displaces principles of common law and equity that would make or recognize exceptions to or other limit or dilute the force and effect of its provisions concerning the enforcement in contract law of credit agreements or…”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(3) — 2 cases
Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier, 580 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1998). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (6). B. Having clarified what law governs, our next task is to apply it to the facts of this case.”
Beal Bank v. Siems, 670 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2003). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (2) (emphasis added). A “ ‘[c]redit agreement’ means any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(4) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 535.17(5) — 3 cases
Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier, 580 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1998). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (6). B. Having clarified what law governs, our next task is to apply it to the facts of this case.”
Beal Bank v. Siems, 670 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2003). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (2) (emphasis added). A “ ‘[c]redit agreement’ means any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
Jacqueline Geiger & Bruce Tracy v. Peoples Trust & Sav. Bank, Chris Goerdt & Country Bancorporation (Iowa Ct. App. 2019). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1) (emphasis added). The district court impliedly rejected this argument.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(5)(a) — 1 case
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa 2025). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1), (5)(c) (2018). The statutory prohibition against actions to enforce unwritten credit agreements and unwritten terms of credit agreements includes any action, petition, counterclaim, or crossclaim “to enforce affirmatively any right or duty or to recover…”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(5)(b) — 3 cases
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa 2025). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1), (5)(c) (2018). The statutory prohibition against actions to enforce unwritten credit agreements and unwritten terms of credit agreements includes any action, petition, counterclaim, or crossclaim “to enforce affirmatively any right or duty or to recover…”
Jacqueline Geiger & Bruce Tracy v. Peoples Trust & Sav. Bank, Chris Goerdt & Country Bancorporation (Iowa Ct. App. 2019). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1) (emphasis added). The district court impliedly rejected this argument.”
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa Ct. App. 2024). “17(5)(c) defines a “credit agreement” as “any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(5)(c) — 4 cases
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa 2025). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1), (5)(c) (2018). The statutory prohibition against actions to enforce unwritten credit agreements and unwritten terms of credit agreements includes any action, petition, counterclaim, or crossclaim “to enforce affirmatively any right or duty or to recover…”
Prof'l Solutions v. Seidman (Iowa 2021). “The Gossett defendants raised fifteen additional affirmative defenses, including: (1) lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) violation of Iowa Code section 535.17, and (3) violation of Iowa’s usury statute contained in Iowa Code section 535.”
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa Ct. App. 2024). “17(5)(c) defines a “credit agreement” as “any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(5)(e) — 1 case
Beal Bank v. Siems, 670 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2003). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (2) (emphasis added). A “ ‘[c]redit agreement’ means any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(6) — 5 cases
C & J Vantage Leasing Co., Assignor to Frontier Leasing Corp., Assignee v. Thomas Wolfe D/B/A Lake Macbride Golf Course & Thomas Wolfe, Individually, 795 N.W.2d 65 (Iowa 2011). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1). This section acts as a statute of frauds for credit agreements by ensuring that actions and defenses on credit agreements “are supported by clear and certain written proof of the terms of such agreements.”
Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier, 580 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1998). “Iowa Code § 535.17 (6). B. Having clarified what law governs, our next task is to apply it to the facts of this case.”
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa 2025). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1), (5)(c) (2018). The statutory prohibition against actions to enforce unwritten credit agreements and unwritten terms of credit agreements includes any action, petition, counterclaim, or crossclaim “to enforce affirmatively any right or duty or to recover…”
Jacqueline Geiger & Bruce Tracy v. Peoples Trust & Sav. Bank, Chris Goerdt & Country Bancorporation (Iowa Ct. App. 2019). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1) (emphasis added). The district court impliedly rejected this argument.”
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa Ct. App. 2024). “17(5)(c) defines a “credit agreement” as “any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
— Iowa Code § 535.17(7) — 2 cases
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa 2025). “” Iowa Code § 535.17 (1), (5)(c) (2018). The statutory prohibition against actions to enforce unwritten credit agreements and unwritten terms of credit agreements includes any action, petition, counterclaim, or crossclaim “to enforce affirmatively any right or duty or to recover…”
Cnty. Bank v. Shalla (Iowa Ct. App. 2024). “17(5)(c) defines a “credit agreement” as “any contract made or acquired by a lender to loan money, finance any transaction, or otherwise extend credit for any purpose, and includes all of the terms of the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.