Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 572.2 (2026)

Persons entitled to lien

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Every person who furnishes any material or labor for, or performs any labor upon, any building or land for improvement, alteration, or repair thereof, including those engaged in the construction or repair of any work of internal or external improvement, and those engaged in grading, sodding, installing nursery stock, landscaping, sidewalk building, fencing on any land or lot, by virtue of any contract with the owner, owner-builder, general contractor, or subcontractor shall have a lien upon such building or improvement, and land belonging to the owner on which the same is situated or upon the land or lot so graded, landscaped, fenced, or otherwise improved, altered, or repaired, to secure payment for the material or labor furnished or labor performed. 2. If material is rented by a person to the owner, general contractor, or subcontractor, the person shall have a lien upon such building, improvement, or land to secure payment for the material rental. The lien is for the reasonable rental value during the period of actual use of the material and any reasonable periods of nonuse of the material taken into account in the rental agreement. The delivery of material to such building, improvement, or land, whether or not delivery is made by the person, creates a presumption that the material was used in the course of alteration, construction, or repair of the building, improvement, or land. However, this presumption shall not pertain to recoveries sought under a surety bond. 3. An owner-builder is not entitled to a lien under this chapter as to work the owner-builder performs, or is contractually obligated to perform, prior to transferring title to the buyer. [C51, §981, 1010; R60, §1846; C73, §2130; C97, §3089; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §10271; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §572.2] 98 Acts, ch 1142, §2; 2007 Acts, ch 83, §3; 2012 Acts, ch 1105, §3, 27, 28; 2012 Acts, ch 1138, §13 Homestead liable, §561.21

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1953–2025 · leading case: Winger Contracting Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 926 N.W.2d 526 (Iowa 2019).
Winger Contracting Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 926 N.W.2d 526 (Iowa 2019). · cites it 54× “83, § 3 (codified at Iowa Code § 572.2 (Supp. 2007)). Thus, according to Cargill, the mechanic's liens in this case attached *532 only to a building, improvement, or land belonging to HFCA, the owner with whom the mechanic's lien claimants entered into contract.”
Schaffer v. Frank Moyer Constr., Inc., 628 N.W.2d 11 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 24× “See Iowa Code §§ 572.2 , .8 (1995). On October 24, Moyer served Schaffer with a notice of demand to bring suit.”
Baumhoefener Nursery, Inc. v. a & D P'ship, II, 618 N.W.2d 363 (Iowa 2000). · cites it 20× “Iowa Code § 572.2 . A & D argued at trial that the lien of section 572.”
Ringland-Johnson-Crowley Co. v. First Cent. Serv. Corp., 255 N.W.2d 149 (Iowa 1977). · cites it 7× “” Section 572.2, The Code, provides in part as follows: “Every person who shall furnish any material or labor for, or perform any labor upon, any building or land for improvement, alteration, or repair thereof, including those engaged in the construction or repair of any work of…”
Nw. Nat'l Bank of Sioux City v. Metro Ctr., Inc., 303 N.W.2d 395 (Iowa 1981). · cites it 6× “The court held that in any event no lienable activities had been performed by Audino because its services did not result in an “improvement” on the premises under section 572.2. Audino’s cross-claim for foreclosure of its mechanic’s lien was rendered moot by the trial court’s…”
W.P. Barber Lumber Co. v. Celania, 674 N.W.2d 62 (Iowa 2003). · cites it 4× “See Iowa Code § 572.2 (1) (2001) (entitling a subcontractor who furnishes material for a new home to a lien against the building and the property on which it is situated, “to secure payment for the material .”
Clemens Graf Droste Zu Vischering v. Kading, 368 N.W.2d 702 (Iowa 1985). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 572.2 (1981). The evidence here, however, shows that Guzeman acted on his own and did not have authority, actual or apparent, to act as Droste’s agent.”
Rohlin Const. Co., Inc. v. Lakes, Inc., 252 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 1977). · cites it 5× “§ 572.2, The Code. They also showed Rohlin’s mechanic’s lien was superior to any rights of defendants in the real estate.”
Bill Grunder's Sons Constr., Inc. v. Ganzer, 686 N.W.2d 193 (Iowa 2004). · cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 572.2 (2003) (“Every person who shall furnish any material or labor for, or perform any labor upon, any building or land for improvement .”
Gollehon, Schemmer & Assocs., Inc. v. Fairway-Bettendorf Assocs., 268 N.W.2d 200 (Iowa 1978). · cites it 3× “2, The Code, which provides: Every person who shall furnish any material or labor for, or perform any labor upon, any building or land for improvement, alteration, or repair thereof, including those engaged in the construction or repair of any work of internal or external…”
Carson v. Roediger, 513 N.W.2d 713 (Iowa 1994). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 572.2 . Mechanic’s liens stem from principles of equity which require paying for work done or materials delivered.”
Des Moines Furnace & Stove Repair Co. v. Lemon, 56 N.W.2d 923 (Iowa 1953). · cites it 8× “The defendants support the decisions of the trial court by these contentions: (1) That there was no such relation between Lemon and defendants as to make him their agent or to bring him within any other of the classes defined in section 572.2, Code of 1950, and so there was.”
— Iowa Code § 572.2(1) — 4 cases
Winger Contracting Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 926 N.W.2d 526 (Iowa 2019). “83, § 3 (codified at Iowa Code § 572.2 (Supp. 2007)). Thus, according to Cargill, the mechanic's liens in this case attached *532 only to a building, improvement, or land belonging to HFCA, the owner with whom the mechanic's lien claimants entered into contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.