Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 88.9 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Aggrieved persons. a. Judicial review of any order of the appeal board issued under section 88.8, subsection 3, may be sought in accordance with the terms of the Iowa administrative procedure Act, chapter 17A. Notwithstanding the terms of the Iowa administrative procedure Act, chapter 17A, petitions for judicial review may be filed in the district court of the county in which the\n\nTue Dec 09 22:29:41 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 88 (29, 0) §88.9, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 10\n\nviolation is alleged to have occurred or where the employer has its principal office and may be filed within sixty days following the issuance of such order. The appeal board’s copy of the testimony shall be available to all parties for examination at all reasonable times, without cost, and for the purpose of judicial review of the appeal board’s orders. b. The commissioner may obtain judicial review or enforcement of any final order or decision of the appeal board by filing a petition in the district court of the county in which the alleged violation occurred or in which the employer has its principal office. The judicial review provisions of chapter 17A shall govern such proceedings to the extent applicable. c. Notwithstanding section 10A.601, subsection 7, and chapter 17A, the commissioner has the exclusive right to represent the appeal board in any judicial review of an appeal board decision under this chapter in which the commissioner does not appeal the appeal board decision, except as provided by section 88.17. 2. Uncontested appeal board orders. If no petition for judicial review is filed within sixty days after service of the appeal board’s order, the appeal board’s findings of fact and order shall be conclusive in connection with any petition for enforcement which is filed by the commissioner after the expiration of such sixty-day period. In any such case, as well as in the case of a noncontested citation or notification by the commissioner which has become a final order of the appeal board under section 88.8, subsection 1 or 2, the clerk of the district court, unless otherwise ordered by the court, shall forthwith enter a decree enforcing the order and shall transmit a copy of such decree to the appeal board and the employer named in the petition. In any contempt proceeding brought to enforce a decree of a district court entered pursuant to this subsection or subsection 1, the district court may assess the penalties provided in section 88.14 in addition to invoking any other available remedies. 3. Discrimination and discharge. a. (1) A person shall not discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee because the employee has filed a complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted a proceeding under or related to this chapter or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by the employee on behalf of the employee or others of a right afforded by this chapter. (2) A person shall not discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee because the employee, who with no reasonable alternative, refuses in good faith to expose the employee’s self to a dangerous condition of a nature that a reasonable person, under the circumstances then confronting the employee, would conclude that there is a real danger of death or serious injury; provided the employee, where possible, has first sought through resort to regular statutory enforcement channels, unless there has been insufficient time due to the urgency of the situation, or the employee has sought and been unable to obtain from the person, a correction of the dangerous condition. b. (1) An employee who believes that the employee has been discharged or otherwise discriminated against by a person in violation of this subsection may, within thirty days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the commissioner alleging discrimination. (2) Upon receipt of the complaint, the commissioner shall conduct an investigation as the commissioner deems appropriate. If, upon investigation, the commissioner determines that the provisions of this subsection have been violated, the commissioner shall bring an action in the appropriate district court against the person. In any such action, the district court has jurisdiction to restrain violations of this subsection and order all appropriate relief including rehiring or reinstatement of the employee to the employee’s former position with back pay. (3) Within ninety days of the receipt of a complaint filed under this subsection, the commissioner shall notify the complainant of the commissioner’s determination under this subsection. [C66, 71, §88A.16; C73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §88.9] 88 Acts, ch 1107, §1; 93 Acts, ch 180, §56, 57; 2003 Acts, ch 44, §114; 2008 Acts, ch 1032, §174 Referred to in §88.6, 602.8102(23)\n\n 88.10 Reserved.\n\nTue Dec 09 22:29:41 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 88 (29, 0) 11 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH, §88.13

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1974–2024 · leading case: George v. D.W. Zinser Co., 762 N.W.2d 865 (Iowa 2009).
George v. D.W. Zinser Co., 762 N.W.2d 865 (Iowa 2009). · cites it 24× “Iowa Code § 88.9 (3)(6 )(2) (emphasis added).”
Karen Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 (Iowa 2013). · cites it 12× “at 871–72 (quoting Iowa Code § 88.9 (3) (2007)). 39 In 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, applying Iowa law, held that an electrical utility employee who had been fired for openly disputing the safety of certain work procedures could pursue a…”
Harry Kohrt, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Midamerican Energy Co., Appellant/cross-Appellee, 364 F.3d 894 (8th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “A person shall not discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee because the employee has filed a complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted a proceeding under or related to this chapter or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or…”
Ballalatak v. All Iowa Agric. Ass'n, 781 N.W.2d 272 (Iowa 2010). · cites it 4× “” Iowa Code § 88.9 (3). Iowa Code section 91A.”
City of Des Moines v. Emp. Appeal Bd., 722 N.W.2d 183 (Iowa 2006). · cites it 2× “2d 596, 601 (Iowa 2004); see also Iowa Code § 88.9 (1) (providing judicial review of occupational safety and health citations is in accordance with the Iowa Administrative Procedure Act).”
Boone Valley Coop. Processing Ass'n v. French Oil Mill Mach. Co., 383 F. Supp. 606 (N.D. Iowa 1974). · cites it 2× “In this case, one of the particulars of plaintiff’s negligence count is based on a safety regulation of the Iowa Safety Code Rules and Regulations, Section 88.9. Thus, at least this particular of negligence may be one which arises independently of the contractual duty, and hence…”
Jeffrey George Vs. D.W. Zinser Co. (Iowa 2009). · cites it 24× “Iowa Code § 88.9 (3)(b)(2) (emphasis added).”
Aaron Ballalatak Vs. All Iowa Agric. Ass'n (Iowa 2010). · cites it 4× “” Iowa Code § 88.9 (3). Iowa Code section 91A.”
Deborah Ferguson v. Exide Tech., Inc. & Fred Gilbert (Iowa 2019). · cites it 2× “Section 88.9(3) granted an aggrieved employee the right to file an administrative action against their employer.”
Byron Kuehl v. Tegra Corp. & Douglas Palmer & James Palmer, Individually & in their Corp. Capacities (Iowa Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “, 6 Iowa Code section 88.9(3)(a)(1) provides, “A person shall not discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee because the employee .”
Ashley Lynn Koester v. Eyerly-Ball Cmty. Mental Health Servs., Rebecca Parker, & Monica Van Horn (Iowa 2024). · cites it 2× “at 871–72 (quoting Iowa Code § 88.9 (3)). We held that a common law wrongful-discharge case could go forward.”
Ashley Lynn Koester v. Eyerly-Ball Cmty. Mental Health Servs., Rebecca Parker, & Monica Van Horn (Iowa 2024). · cites it 2× “at 871–72 (quoting Iowa Code § 88.9 (3)). We held that a common law wrongful-discharge case could go forward.”
— Iowa Code § 88.9(3) — 6 cases
George v. D.W. Zinser Co., 762 N.W.2d 865 (Iowa 2009). “Iowa Code § 88.9 (3)(6 )(2) (emphasis added).”
Karen Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C., 835 N.W.2d 293 (Iowa 2013). “at 871–72 (quoting Iowa Code § 88.9 (3) (2007)). 39 In 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, applying Iowa law, held that an electrical utility employee who had been fired for openly disputing the safety of certain work procedures could pursue a…”
Ballalatak v. All Iowa Agric. Ass'n, 781 N.W.2d 272 (Iowa 2010). “” Iowa Code § 88.9 (3). Iowa Code section 91A.”
Jeffrey George Vs. D.W. Zinser Co. (Iowa 2009). “Iowa Code § 88.9 (3)(b)(2) (emphasis added).”
Deborah Ferguson v. Exide Tech., Inc. & Fred Gilbert (Iowa 2019). “Section 88.9(3) granted an aggrieved employee the right to file an administrative action against their employer.”
— Iowa Code § 88.9(3)(a)(1) — 1 case
Byron Kuehl v. Tegra Corp. & Douglas Palmer & James Palmer, Individually & in their Corp. Capacities (Iowa Ct. App. 2022). “, 6 Iowa Code section 88.9(3)(a)(1) provides, “A person shall not discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee because the employee .”
— Iowa Code § 88.9(3)(b)(1) — 1 case
Jeffrey George Vs. D.W. Zinser Co. (Iowa 2009). “Iowa Code § 88.9 (3)(b)(2) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.