Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 17-7306 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

17-7306.

History: L. 1972, ch. 52, § 146; L. 1996, ch. 135, § 3; L. 1999, ch. 41, § 12; L. 2004, ch. 143, § 82; Repealed, L. 2014, ch. 121, § 46; January 1, 2015.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2006 · leading case: Merriman v. Crompton Corp., 146 P.3d 162 (Kan. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Merriman v. Crompton Corp., 146 P.3d 162 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 3× “Furthermore, a different statute, K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 17-7306, sets out the procedure when claims are filed against a foreign corporation formerly but no longer doing business in Kansas.”

Slawson v. Dome Petroleum Corp., 561 F. Supp. 67 (D. Kan. 1983). · cites it 2× “Moran admits that it has in fact conducted remunerative business activities in Kansas in the past, and Moran’s maintenance of its authorized status, despite the provisions of K.S.A. § 17-7306 allowing the voluntary surrender of that status, supports the assumption that Moran…”

— K.S.A. § 17-7306(c) — 1 case

Merriman v. Crompton Corp., 146 P.3d 162 (Kan. 2006). “Furthermore, a different statute, K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 17-7306, sets out the procedure when claims are filed against a foreign corporation formerly but no longer doing business in Kansas.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.