K.S.A. » Chapter 21

K.S.A. § 21-3435

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3435.

History: L. 1992, ch. 289, § 7; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 45; L. 1999, ch. 164, § 7; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2023 · leading case: State v. Richardson
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Richardson (2009) kan · cites it 23× “Richardson claims the statute defining the crime, K.S.A. 21-3435, is unconstitutionally vague; that the district court erred in failing to treat K.”
State v. Prine (2013) kan “21-3447, and amendments thereto; (3) exposing another to a life threatening communicable disease, as described in subsection (a)(1) of K.S.A. 21-3435, and amendments thereto; (4) incest, as described in K.”
State v. Breeden (2013) kan “21-5426, and amendments thereto; (3) exposing another to a life threatening communicable disease, as described in subsection (a)(1) of K.S.A. 21-3435, prior to its repeal, or subsection (a)(1) of K.”
In re C.P.W. (2009) kan “In Richardson , we held that specific intent is required by K.S.A. 21-3435(a)(l), which makes it unlawful for a person who knows he or she is infected with a life-threatening communicable disease to knowingly engage in sexual intercourse or sodomy with another individual with…”
State v. Scheetz (2023) kanctapp · cites it 2× “21-5426(b)(1)(B) or (b)(2), and amendments thereto; (3) exposing another to a life threatening communicable disease, as described in K.S.A. 21-3435(a)(1), prior to its repeal, or K.”
State v. Richardson (2011) kanctapp “See K.S.A. 21-3435. Because it is relevant to the issues presented by Richardson on appeal, we direct our attention to the following chronology for the cases in two of those counties: 05-2006 Lyon County, Kansas prosecutor filed charges 06-2006: against Richardson (Lyon County…”
In Re CPW (2009) kan “In Richardson, we held that specific intent is required by K.S.A. 21-3435(a)(1), which makes it unlawful for a person who knows he or she is infected with a life-threatening communicable disease to knowingly engage in sexual intercourse or sodomy with another individual with the…”
— K.S.A. § 21-3435(a)(1) — 2 cases
State v. Scheetz (2023) kanctapp “21-5426(b)(1)(B) or (b)(2), and amendments thereto; (3) exposing another to a life threatening communicable disease, as described in K.S.A. 21-3435(a)(1), prior to its repeal, or K.”
In Re CPW (2009) kan “In Richardson, we held that specific intent is required by K.S.A. 21-3435(a)(1), which makes it unlawful for a person who knows he or she is infected with a life-threatening communicable disease to knowingly engage in sexual intercourse or sodomy with another individual with the…”
— K.S.A. § 21-3435(a)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Richardson (2009) kan “Richardson claims the statute defining the crime, K.S.A. 21-3435, is unconstitutionally vague; that the district court erred in failing to treat K.”
In re C.P.W. (2009) kan “In Richardson , we held that specific intent is required by K.S.A. 21-3435(a)(l), which makes it unlawful for a person who knows he or she is infected with a life-threatening communicable disease to knowingly engage in sexual intercourse or sodomy with another individual with…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.