Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3503 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3503.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3503; L. 1975, ch. 193, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 109, § 3; L. 1984, ch. 118, § 1; L. 1985, ch. 109, § 2; L. 1987, ch. 108, § 1; L. 1989, ch. 89, § 1; L. 1993, ch. 253, § 3; L. 1993, ch. 253, § 4; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 157 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1973–2022 · leading case: State v. Fierro, 895 P.2d 186 (Kan. 1995).
John Doe v. M.J., 508 P.3d 368 (Kan. 2022).
State v. Moore (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 21-3503(c); K.S.A. 21-3504(c). If Moore violated G.”
John Doe v. M.J., 482 P.3d 596 (Kan. Ct. App. 2021).
Krebs v. State (Kan. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Toothman, 448 P.3d 1039 (Kan. 2019). “See K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 21-3503. Aggravated incest was defined to include engaging in "sexual intercourse, sodomy or an unlawful sex act, as defined by K.”
State v. Dubry, 444 P.3d 328 (Kan. 2019).
Doe v. Thompson, 373 P.3d 750 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 2× “3 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW In 2003, after being charged with inappropriately touching or fondling a 14- or 15- year-old child, Doe pled guilty to and was convicted of one count of indecent liberties with a minor, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3503(a)(1) (Furse 1995). In April…”
State v. Riolo, 330 P.3d 1120 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “Both parties, as well as the district court, appear to agree that the most similar of our Kansas offenses is indecent liberties with a child, found at the time in K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 21-3503. That statute reads: “Indecent liberties with a child is engaging in any of the following…”
State v. Hart, 301 P.3d 1279 (Kan. 2013). “21-3504(a)(1)(A) to two counts of indecent liberties with a child under K.S.A. 21-3503, a severity level 5 felony.”
In re Kline, 311 P.3d 321 (Kan. 2013). “, “the absence of a definitive complainant or allegation that a medical provider knowingly failed to report a specific incident of sexual abuse as statutorily defined by K.S.A. 21-3503(l)(a).” If the SRS records revealed potential violations of K.”
State v. Dinh Loc Ta, 290 P.3d 652 (Kan. 2012). “) K.S.A. 21-3503(l)(b) (Weeks). This court agreed with Conley’s arguments, concluding the statute did not sufficiently describe the type of contact that was prohibited.”
State v. Edwards, 288 P.3d 494 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(1) — 11 cases
State v. Clements, 734 P.2d 1096 (Kan. 1987).
State v. Belcher, 4 P.3d 1137 (Kan. 2000).
Williams v. Darr, 603 P.2d 1021 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).
State v. Coberly, 661 P.2d 383 (Kan. 1983).
State v. Peltier, 819 P.2d 628 (Kan. 1991).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Fulcher, 737 P.2d 61 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(1)(b) — 4 cases
Wilson v. State, 71 P.3d 1180 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Sandberg, 235 P.3d 476 (Kan. 2010).
In Re Mary P., 701 P.2d 681 (Kan. 1985).
State v. Fulcher, 737 P.2d 61 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(3) — 1 case
Seaton v. State, 998 P.2d 131 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a) — 7 cases
State v. Myers, 923 P.2d 1024 (Kan. 1996).
State v. Rutherford, 184 P.3d 959 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Jones, 21 P.3d 569 (Kan. 2001).
State v. Hart, 242 P.3d 1230 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
State v. Risinger, 194 P.3d 52 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a)(1) — 5 cases
Farris v. McKune, 911 P.2d 177 (Kan. 1996).
State v. Hart, 242 P.3d 1230 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
State v. Diaz, 241 P.3d 1018 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).
State v. Chrisco, 995 P.2d 401 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).
Doe v. Thompson, 373 P.3d 750 (Kan. 2016). “3 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW In 2003, after being charged with inappropriately touching or fondling a 14- or 15- year-old child, Doe pled guilty to and was convicted of one count of indecent liberties with a minor, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3503(a)(1) (Furse 1995). In April…”
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a)(3)(A) — 1 case
State v. Alvis, 53 P.3d 1232 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(a)(l) — 5 cases
State v. Richardson, 209 P.3d 696 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Ward, 886 P.2d 890 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Price, 948 P.2d 1145 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
Doe v. Thompson, 373 P.3d 750 (Kan. 2016). “3 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW In 2003, after being charged with inappropriately touching or fondling a 14- or 15- year-old child, Doe pled guilty to and was convicted of one count of indecent liberties with a minor, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3503(a)(1) (Furse 1995). In April…”
State v. Rodriguez, 933 P.2d 164 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(b) — 2 cases
State v. Moore, 55 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(c) — 3 cases
State v. Ward, 886 P.2d 890 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Moore (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “K.S.A. 21-3503(c); K.S.A. 21-3504(c). If Moore violated G.”
Ploeckelmann v. Finney, 978 F. Supp. 1432 (D. Kan. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(e) — 1 case
Ploeckelmann v. Finney, 978 F. Supp. 1432 (D. Kan. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Nunn, 768 P.2d 268 (Kan. 1989).
In re Kline, 311 P.3d 321 (Kan. 2013). “, “the absence of a definitive complainant or allegation that a medical provider knowingly failed to report a specific incident of sexual abuse as statutorily defined by K.S.A. 21-3503(l)(a).” If the SRS records revealed potential violations of K.”
State v. Fike, 757 P.2d 724 (Kan. 1988).
State Ex Rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, 847 P.2d 1273 (Kan. 1993).
State v. Kilpatrick, 578 P.2d 1147 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(b) — 17 cases
State v. Fike, 757 P.2d 724 (Kan. 1988).
State v. Nunn, 768 P.2d 268 (Kan. 1989).
State v. Jackson, 721 P.2d 232 (Kan. 1986).
State v. Riolo, 330 P.3d 1120 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “Both parties, as well as the district court, appear to agree that the most similar of our Kansas offenses is indecent liberties with a child, found at the time in K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 21-3503. That statute reads: “Indecent liberties with a child is engaging in any of the following…”
State v. Dinh Loc Ta, 290 P.3d 652 (Kan. 2012). “) K.S.A. 21-3503(l)(b) (Weeks). This court agreed with Conley’s arguments, concluding the statute did not sufficiently describe the type of contact that was prohibited.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. Jackson, 721 P.2d 232 (Kan. 1986).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(fe) — 1 case
State v. Boling, 617 P.2d 102 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(h) — 1 case
State v. Voiles, 601 P.2d 1121 (Kan. 1979).
— K.S.A. § 21-3503(l)(o) — 1 case
State v. Boling, 617 P.2d 102 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.