K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3606 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3606.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3606; Repealed, L. 1992, ch. 298, § 97; Repealed, L. 1993, ch. 291, § 283; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Historical form of "doctrine of necessaries," while unconstitutional, expanded to apply to husbands and wives equally. St. Francis Regional Med. Center, Inc. v. Bowles, 251 Kan. 334, 339, 836 P.2d 1123 (1992).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2010 · leading case: St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Bowles, 836 P.2d 1123 (Kan. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Bowles, 836 P.2d 1123 (Kan. 1992). “21-3605 is supplemented by the criminal desertion statute, K.S.A. 21-3606, which states: “Criminal desertion is a husband’s or wife’s abandonment or willful failure without just cause to provide for the care, protection or support of a spouse who is in ill health or necessitous…”
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “Thus, we approach the heart of the issue before us: Does the judicial rule of In re Clyne have efficacy regarding prosecutions under tire KJJC notwithstanding the lack of a specific provision within the code? K.”
Beem v. State of Kansas, 278 F.3d 1108 (10th Cir. 2002). “253, § 15 (amending Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3606 ). . Though the sentence imposed in Von Atkinson was less than what the prior law authorized, the finding of force increased the penalty relative to what the current law authorized absent a finding of force.”
In Re Prg, 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “Thus, we approach the heart of the issue before us: Does the judicial rule of In re Clyne have efficacy regarding prosecutions under the KJJC notwithstanding the lack of a specific provision within the code? K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3606(7) — 2 cases
In re P.R.G., 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “Thus, we approach the heart of the issue before us: Does the judicial rule of In re Clyne have efficacy regarding prosecutions under tire KJJC notwithstanding the lack of a specific provision within the code? K.”
In Re Prg, 244 P.3d 279 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “Thus, we approach the heart of the issue before us: Does the judicial rule of In re Clyne have efficacy regarding prosecutions under the KJJC notwithstanding the lack of a specific provision within the code? K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.