K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-3745 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3745.

History: L. 1972, ch. 119, § 1; L. 1973, ch. 139, § 2; Repealed, L. 1992, ch. 298, § 97; Repealed, L. 1993, ch. 291, § 283; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. No error by trial court in denying motion to suppress evidence obtained from search the evidentiary basis for which was obtained by monitoring appellant's telephone; section ruled constitutional. State v. Hruska, 219 Kan. 233, 243, 547 P.2d 732.

2. Crimes in which prior conviction is a necessary element distinguished from crimes considered in establishing penalties. State v. Loudermilk, 221 Kan. 157, 160, 557 P.2d 1229.

3. Referred to in construing Campaign Finance Act. State v. Doyen, 224 Kan. 482, 489, 580 P.2d 1351.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1978–1993 · leading case: State v. Doyen, 580 P.2d 1351 (Kan. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Doyen, 580 P.2d 1351 (Kan. 1978). “21-3736; and theft of telecommunication services, K.S.A. 21-3745. Thus the legislature has rather frequently included the “causing” of an act to fall within the statutory definition of a crime when it desired to do so.”
State v. Kohlman, 854 P.2d 318 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “Kohlman appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea to two counts of theft of telecommunication services, K.S.A. 21-3745. Kohlman claims the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to permit him to withdraw his plea of nolo…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.