Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-3824 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-3824.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3824; L. 1992; ch. 298, § 57; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 115; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1996–2004 · leading case: State v. Seck, 58 P.3d 730 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Messer, 91 P.3d 1191 (Kan. 2004). “He claims the governing statute, K.S.A. 21-3824, is unconstitutional and the evidence against him insufficient.”
State v. Seck, 58 P.3d 730 (Kan. 2002). “Seck, who was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by this court in 1995, attacks the constitutionality of K.S.A. 21-3824, a false impersonation criminal statute.”
In re Lucas, 46 P.3d 558 (Kan. 2002). “On October 19, 2000, the Johnson County District Attorney charged the Respondent with false impersonation, in violation of K.S.A. 21-3824, by unlawfully and willfully representing himself to be a person licensed to practice or engage in a profession for which a license is…”
In Re Howlett, 969 P.2d 890 (Kan. 1998). “On January 20, 1998, Respondent entered a guilty plea to False Impersonation in violation of K.S.A. 21-3824. This offense was a misdemeanor.”
State v. Marino, 929 P.2d 173 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “IS K.S.A. 21-3824 VOID FOR VAGUENESS? This is a constitutional question.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3824(a) — 2 cases
State v. Seck, 58 P.3d 730 (Kan. 2002). “Seck, who was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by this court in 1995, attacks the constitutionality of K.S.A. 21-3824, a false impersonation criminal statute.”
State v. Marino, 929 P.2d 173 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “IS K.S.A. 21-3824 VOID FOR VAGUENESS? This is a constitutional question.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.